User talk:Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco/Archives/2021

Amargor

Please note that your assertion about Amargor supposedly running a "sensationalist" website may be against Wikipedia's harassment policy. You should focus on the reliability of the editor's edits on Wikipedia, without alluding to their off-Wikipedia activities. The relevant policy states: "Dredging up their off-site opinions to repeatedly challenge their edits can be a form of harassment". Such activity may lead to you being blocked.--Jeffro77 (talk) 21:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

I answered you on the discussion page. I only stated what I was worried about, and decided not to take any action on my own.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 23:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Infoboxes

They need to be based on the article and of course sourced, although the sources can be in the article rather than the infobox. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes in particular the sections starting at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes#Using infoboxes in articles --Doug Weller talk 20:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

I totally understood. Thank you.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 23:26, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Your edit to Patrick W. Skehan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 11:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of AqBurkitt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AqBurkitt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AqBurkitt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the announcement. Let's see what happens.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 04:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Tetragrammaton into AqBurkitt. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder. Be well.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 04:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AqBurkitt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Book of Kings.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Thomas Nelson Winter

Hello, Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thomas Nelson Winter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale

Hello, Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Nelson Winter has been accepted

Thomas Nelson Winter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jehovah, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brill and Lukas Vischer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Presence of Tetragrammaton in the Septuagint

Hello, Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Presence of Tetragrammaton in the Septuagint, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Wanda Reisel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wanda Reisel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 10:50, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Wanda Reisel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wanda Reisel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 18:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wanda Reisel has been accepted

Wanda Reisel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 21:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)