Jaimkabra

June 2015

Hello, I'm 78.26. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Cashback website, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. In particular, removing a valid source with a commercial site that does not support the claim is wrong on more than one level. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Royal Neighbors of America, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Online shopping rewards, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Worm^TT(talk) 09:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaimkabra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Link seemed legitimate. dead link was replaced by the one more convincing.

Decline reason:

This edit was unacceptable. You should not generally be including the front page of any website as a reference, certainly not to a general purpose article on the topic which is for a worldwide audience. Until you understand how this is problematic, I cannot unblock you. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.