User talk:Jaguarnik/Archive 1(All 2021 and 2022 messages)
 | This is an archive of past discussions with Jaguarnik. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1(All 2021 and 2022 messages) |
| All Pages: | 1 - ... (up to 100) |
Welcome!
Hi Jaguarnik! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Women in Red
Hi there, Jaguarnik, and welcome to Women in Red. As a new contributor, you might like to gain some basic experience in editing with The Wikipedia Adventure. When you feel ready to create your own biographies you should look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Jaguarnik! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 03:38, Wednesday, April 7, 2021 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
May 2021 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hallo, Thank you for creating Maye (singer) . When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Maye), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 06:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Maye (singer) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Maye (singer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 08:18, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Maye (singer) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maye (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
August Editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
If you can find a better, reliable source
So, I reversed your edit on the High Guardian Spice page, as you probably already know, which added the line "It debuted as the lowest-rated series to date on Crunchyroll, with anonymous viewers criticizing the poor story, animation quality, and flat characters." While I do not think akibamarket.com is a reliable source, I also think there is a possibility, however low, of a source which notes this. If you can find such a source, feel free to re-add that line to the reception section. --Historyday01 (talk) 22:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Would it be acceptable to cite directly from the review page for the series on the Crunchyroll site? I know it's not a source of news but the anonymous viewers giving it a low score and criticizing it can still be proven by the site reviews themselves.Jaguarnik (talk) 23:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think so, no, as I'd see that as equivalent to reviews on IMDB, which are user-submitted... and Wikipedia is pretty strongly against user submissions, not even wanting tweets or other social media posts to be published that much. But, thanks for asking. Its better than some people who have gotten angry at me for reversing their edits and turning it into a personal attack against me, sadly. --Historyday01 (talk) 00:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Alright, if I find a reliable source of news, then the info can be put back in; otherwise I understand the revision.Jaguarnik (talk) 00:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. I asked on the reliable sources noticeboard about bubbleblabber.com, as there is a review on there, to inform whether I should add it in or not. --Historyday01 (talk) 01:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- It looks like Bubbleblabber isn't that reliable, according to a reply on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#How reliable is Bubbleblabber as a source?. The one user who replied to me said "not sure as to its reliability...I personally don't see their use as highly problematic, and would suggest just adding a better source needed tag when relevant. In regards to their reviews, I'd follow RT's example of only using them when written by Daniel Kurland. Otherwise, as the source is not very prominent, it's best to use other critics and consider whether Bubbleblabber's reference should or should not be removed on a case-by-case basis." So, I'll try to look for some more reviews myself, when I have some time. Just thought I'd update you on that.Historyday01 (talk) 15:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. I asked on the reliable sources noticeboard about bubbleblabber.com, as there is a review on there, to inform whether I should add it in or not. --Historyday01 (talk) 01:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Alright, if I find a reliable source of news, then the info can be put back in; otherwise I understand the revision.Jaguarnik (talk) 00:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think so, no, as I'd see that as equivalent to reviews on IMDB, which are user-submitted... and Wikipedia is pretty strongly against user submissions, not even wanting tweets or other social media posts to be published that much. But, thanks for asking. Its better than some people who have gotten angry at me for reversing their edits and turning it into a personal attack against me, sadly. --Historyday01 (talk) 00:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Woland (film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Woland (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 23:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, I did not move the draft to namespace (that was a different user) but I'm very sorry about that.Jaguarnik (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Jaguarnik: I think it only needs a couple of things fixed and that's it sorted. scope_creepTalk 00:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Woland (film)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Woland (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woland (film). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. scope_creepTalk 23:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Nuremberg (2021 film)
Hello, Jaguarnik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nuremberg (2021 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Michael Lockshin
Hello, Jaguarnik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael Lockshin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Mariana Froes
Hello, Jaguarnik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mariana Froes".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Woland (film) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:30, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Moving pages to Draft space
Hello, Jaguarnik,
If you move a page from main space to Draft space, please take a moment to tag the original page for speedy deletion, CSD R2. Twinkle is a helpful tool many editors use to tag pages for deletion and I recommend it. Also, please remember to notify the page creator that you moved the page. Thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 02:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorzhi Banzarov has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Spicy (talk) 16:37, 19 February 2022 (UTC)March editathons
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your thread has been archived
|
Hi Jaguarnik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Lockshin (film director) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
— The Most Comfortable Chair 07:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Igor Moiseyev Ballet has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 13:36, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Jaguarnik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Jaguarnik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Ways to improve Michael Lockshin (film director)
Hello, Jaguarnik,
Thank you for creating Michael Lockshin (film director).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
There's no notability for him - the awards were to films, not for 'best director' and his Discovery nomination is not a win. He's arguably not notable and maybe worth trying to find better sources for his notability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alexandermcnabb}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Jaguarnik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Some baklava for you!
|
Great job on Igor Moiseyev Ballet. I think you're most of the way toward a successful Good article nomination. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much Firefangledfeathers. How can I improve it further? If you left any feedback then it's not available for me to view.Jaguarnik (talk) 22:19, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- You're welcome! I didn't leave any feedback, so you didn't miss anything. The article is a bit outside my knowledge base, so I don't have any non-generic advice. If I were you I would focus on expanding the body, splitting into subsections, and then summarizing more points in the lead. You can review the Good article criteria, which are not so onerous. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Nuremberg (2022 film)
Hello, Jaguarnik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nuremberg (2022 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hadriana in All My Dreams has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Greenman (talk) 19:38, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Your draft article, Draft:Nuremberg (2022 film)
Hello, Jaguarnik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nuremberg".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:28, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Are you serious? That was vandalism? Esszet (talk) 00:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Explain to me why it was notJaguarnik (talk) 05:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Seriously? The words "the man himself" are somehow vandalism in an article about a man with an extremely famous company named after him? Esszet (talk) 01:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Danilov, the Violist has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Greenman (talk) 08:32, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Concern regarding Draft:Khotsa Namsaraev
Hello, Jaguarnik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Khotsa Namsaraev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Olga Kuzmina
Hello, Jaguarnik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olga Kuzmina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Genshin Impact characters for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Genshin Impact characters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Genshin Impact characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Disappearance of Josef Mengele has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Rusalkii (talk) 23:16, 25 November 2022 (UTC)ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)