Welcome!

Hello, Jagadeesh T! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 18:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

April 2017

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Nellai Express. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 02:39, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2017

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Nellai Express does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 22:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Arumuganeri railway station, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Vin09(talk) 13:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Arumuganeri railway station

edit

Your addition of time tables on Arumuganeri railway station does not comply with WP:NTT rule and hence, removed. Please do not add WP:OR as well.--Vin09(talk) 13:46, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2017

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arumuganeri railway station. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vin09(talk) 17:42, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Arumuganeri railway station, you may be blocked from editing. Vin09(talk) 07:06, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring

edit
 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nellai Express. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 06:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arumuganeri railway station. Jim1138 (talk) 06:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2017

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nellai Express. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 17:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. See Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 04:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jagadeesh_T reported by User:Jim1138 (Result: ). Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:42, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Original research

edit

"I am editing based on reliable human sources" is original research. See wp:No original research Jim1138 (talk) 06:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Nellai Express. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Lord Roem ~ (talk) 07:18, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Arumuganeri railway station. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 10:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Arumuganeri railway station. - Arjayay (talk) 15:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Nellai Express.  LeoFrank  Talk 10:38, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply