JacobBul
JacobBul, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi JacobBul! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Anataban Campaign has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
-- Dane talk 19:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)The article Anataban Campaign has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- I'm not entirely sure that this is notable enough, but I didn't want to hasty tag it A7. If notable, it needs to be copyedited and essentially rewritten for tone, grammatical errors, TONE, structure, TONE...
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ɯɐɔ 💬 00:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
David Manyok Barac Atem
editHello JacobBul, I've looked at David Manyok Barac Atem, an article you created. Although there are several general references they don't appear to support much of the article content. As you may know, all content in Wikipedia must be based on published sources. Some of the content appears to be more detailed than is likely to be included in independent reliable sources - suggesting it may be based on original research. I've started a discussion at Talk:David Manyok Barac Atem regarding this issue. I invite you to participate in that discussion. Gab4gab (talk) 12:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)