Welcome...

Hello, JZNIOSH, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.  Again, welcome! SpinningSpark 12:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Reply

Minor edits

edit

You might find it useful to read WP:MINOR. SpinningSpark 23:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Musculoskeletal disorder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Splint (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:12, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Personal protective equipment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Particulates (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Protective gear in sports

edit

Hi, I'm Kudpung. JZNIOSH, thanks for creating Protective gear in sports!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article is unsourced and looks like WP:Original research.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Absenteeism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Workplace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Total Worker Health

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Total Worker Health, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Thebestofall007 (talk) 19:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)Reply


References=

edit

Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks and welcome to Wikipedia.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:48, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Congrats... You created your Teahouse profile!

edit

Nice to see you at the Teahouse!


  Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Carliitaeliza TALK 14:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Teahouse Turns One!

edit

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


  Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:45, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

independently

edit

"More to the point" you say. The point that is being made about studies not funded by one interested party finding no negative effect, to stress that point you don't want to mention that these studies are funded by other interested parties. Call that NPOV? Ssscienccce (talk) 14:43, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Help with Health issues in American football article?

edit

I noticed that, back in 2012, you made some improvements to the Health issues in American football article. I'm currently working on behalf of the NFL Players Association to work on some football-related topics, and have posted a few improvements I think could be made to the Injuries section of that article. If you have a chance, could you take a look and see what you think? Cheers, ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 19:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 18:26, 31 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

November 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Phosphorus trichloride may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • limits for PCl<sub>3</sub>. The [[Occupational Safety and Health Administration]] has set a [[permissible exposure limit] at 0.5 ppm over a time-weighted average of 8 hours, while the [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Colors of compounds vs color of samples

edit

Hi, I am an editor interested in chemistry. You will find that many technical reports describe colors of samples in a variety of ways. It is okay within the article to state that (impure) samples might have diverse appearances, but the chembox, as currently construed, describes the color of the compound, not impure samples. Impurities, for example, confer all sorts of effects. White compounds often give tan or amber samples. I would not believe government sources for colors but consult real chemistry books. I hope that you understand but would be willing to discuss further if you wish. Happy editing, Cheers,--Smokefoot (talk) 23:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply