Joseph Valenti - Owner of NERO Live Adventure Games, LLC

Wikipedia helps people break the law - be careful of criminals putting info on the WP website and placing lies on Wikipedia about you, as it is very hard to get anything removed.

I will use this page to explain my story and how I got repeatedly dogged by Wikipedia staff members all hell bent on retaining their precious power over the information presented on the internet.

As of this writing I actually did receive some help, so things are looking good. It seems that right now I have read for a few hours, a few hundred pages, and write some legal letters.

Well, another one of my posts got removed, reverted or what-ever'd by some anonymous person who I'm permitted to speak to via some wild Wikipedia / wikimedia style posting method, if I know html that is. this shits too confusing - Wikipedia is looking pretty dead. now I just need it to get the lies about me off the website.

I added another helpme section to my talk page, this one telling them they did not have the correct information about nero on the history of role playing page and i changed it to be correct. they said I was incorrect. Ithey have no citation from any source, let alone a reliable source, to the claims made on the page however, so how was the info able to make it to the page? the answer is obvious - there is someone who dislikes nero that wrote this, and Wikipedia just doesn't care if the lies are on their website or not. well, I care.

This occurred to me years ago, and I got nowhere then too.

I'm sure that the shit talkers have someone on the inside on Wikipedia who started early on when Wikipedia started.

This is why no one likes Wikipedia in the first place - and why people know Wikipedia is just a big bunch of lies with information that is unverified and placed by a biased party trying to gain prestige because Wikipedia is taken as fact and truth.

It's pathetic that Wikipedia is allowing criminals to advertise themselves and there organization on the site.

IMPORTANT NOTES - the creators know if we could do this stuff Wikipedia would be destroyed. 1). "Do Not Make Legal Threats on Wikipedia"

2. Here's the Wikipedia Policy that is totally broken. Please Note that my name is mentioned in two sentences on the 'alliance larp' page, and both statements are lies; "ANY commentary about a living person MUST be linked to a valid, third party reliable source."

3. "Please read the WP:AFD page to understand how to participate in an AFD discussion." 4. "Please Read WP:OTRS to see if there are off-Wikipedia issues that may be taken into account."

5. My First ENTRY about the Alliance LARP group -- Alliance LARP was changed by JValentiNero (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939003 on 2014-02-03T21:37:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Welcome edit

Hello, JValentiNero, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

How to deal with problems in an article about you edit

Please see the guidance here: Wikipedia:Autobiography#Problems_in_an_article_about_you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

I read the info above, and indeed I mentioned that I was bringing copyright infringement lawsuits on my first post. How would one go about 'withdrawing' something they wrote, so that it adheres to the WP practices and policies? My post was removed by one of the moderators, and he told me not to do it again so I won't, but wouldn't his removing my post have 'withdrawn' the problem. I might not be blocked from posting either, how would I tell that?

admittedly, this is disheartening. this WP site seems like its backwards. it seem that for me to get the lies removed from a page seems like it is too much work, too much time. and this doesn't seem fair when the WP policies say the info should have been verified, and clearly it was not - I see 5 lies on the 'alliance larp' page that should have been verified as lies. and you expect me to hunt down the date the 'alliance larp' was established, and show you the link? you need to verify the truth before you allow these lies up on your website. Ask the guy for the first incorporation letter from '1989'. I am being insulted and people are being misled because someone on WP staff allowed lies to be placed on the WP website.

Do you have a DMCA policy anywhere here that I can read please?

February 2014 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to History of live action role-playing games, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 23:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is the 2nd instance that I see WikiPedia has allowed incorrect information to be presented to the public.

This is beginning to get serious.

In the above statement I have been told not to alter information without it being reliable source, but the information you have up there saying that there are nero splinter games but you have no games listed. and you say that solar is a splinter game, but it is licensed, so Wikipedia is wrong.

How pathetic that Wikipedia allows information to be added to its website, without verifying it is true or false, and then when the owner and agent of the very organization that it's speaking about - NERO LARP - comes and corrects the information that it has up there about it, it is removed by some invisible volunteer who is anonymous.

And, judging from the way these guys like to quote the Wikipedia policies, I can tell they're in 'auto' mode, and no one will get anywhere unless they follow the policies (or complain to the legal department after reading the red-tape).

I'll also note that no one has answered my helpme request from an hour ago but they are quick to 'revert' changes I've made and 'paste' the 'do not alter anything peasant' message to me here on my talk page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by JValentiNero (talkcontribs)

Hi JValentiNero. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages (such as this one) by adding ~~~~ to the end of your remarks.

Your edit was reverted because they didn't provide a valid source. If you're trying to prove information wrong, you need a source to back it up and confirm that what you are saying is correct. Before re-adding, please discuss it on the article talk page. K6ka (talk | contribs) 02:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

JValentiNero, you are invited to the Teahouse edit

 

Hi JValentiNero! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply