J4985756

May 2023

Hello! I'm Arjayay. Your recent edit(s) to the page Battle of Dewair (1606) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:19, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Battle of Dewair (1606). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

i have provided right information

https://www.rajras.in/1582-battle-of-dewair/ u can check J4985756 (talk) 14:55, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Neemrana, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 15:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rajput architecture. - Arjayay (talk) 15:13, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Yaduvanshi Rajput, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 15:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

hello sir i want to say that i am correcting some basic information

so please don't do such things various things are not correct in this particular article i can also provide source to you J4985756 (talk) 15:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

sir I have provided sources and tags so please consider my edit and don't revert it again my humble request J4985756 (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaiverdhan singh chauhan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jaiverdhan singh chauhan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - FitIndia ^{Talk (Admin/CheckUser on Commons)} 17:53, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

it's important i will edit it J4985756 (talk) 17:55, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

J4985756 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i am correcting articles with proper sources J4985756 (talk) 18:33, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

J4985756 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:47, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please reread WP:GAB. If you continue making unblock requests that don't address the reason for your block, you will lose access to your talk page. --Yamla (talk) 18:47, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

J4985756 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i understand what i have been blocked for. 2.will not continue to cause damage or disruption. 3.will make useful contribution instead.

Decline reason:

Tell us what you've been blocked for so we know you understand enough to not continue causing disruption; and tell us what sort of useful contributions you will make. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

J4985756 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i was blocked for disrupting content but i think they are misguided I myself know the history of my ancestors and i was correcting the article so I request you to kindly unblock me

Decline reason:

Since, contrary to your prior requests, you think that your edits were appropriate, there are no grounds to remove the block. Furthermore, since it is clear you are unable or unwilling to directly address the concerns raised, I am removing your access to this page. This will leave you with WP:UTRS for further appeals, but they will need to be radically different than these previous ones. 331dot (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

J4985756 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

J4985756 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

• Blocking administrator: not provided.

---

Decline reason: You are not autoblocked, you are blocked directly. 331dot (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)