J.meija

RE: Article for Creation, John Feehan

Hello J.meija, Thanks for your review and comments. For your information, another editor already informed us that they considered the page ready for publication (OrenBachman). Whose advice do I follow? I'm glad to add some text to emphasise the subject's notability as an award-winning environmental communicator, but not if another editor will ask for it to be taken out (risk of peacock terms?). As the subject is an academic, we are emphasising his authoritative publication record. If you could provide some additional tips on how to proceed it would be appreciated. Thanks, Jane F. Jfeehan (talk) 13:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

RE: Article for Creation, John Feehan

Hello again, Thanks for the message. I've revised the article with this in mind, and am now resubmitting. Looking forward to hearing from you again. Best wishes, Jane F. 94.103.214.167 (talk) 21:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

J.meija, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi J.meija! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

HotCat

Be careful there with HotCat, you can easily burn yourself by accident if you aren't careful. I undid your two recent edits to Category:Pending AfC submissions. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul (public) 13:13, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

I have added several independent references to the article now. Please advise if this is sufficient now.j.meija 18:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

MOWAG Shark

Hello, I didn't understand why you say this article looks like an advertisment. There is only the history and the tecnical datas writtten down. Also it couldent be seen as advertisment , because this vehicle never got in production. Also there are 3 interpendent sources listete 2 boodifferend books from 2 aouthors and the informations aviable from the museum who has one of the prototypes in display. please get more specific what have to be improved so that i can fix it. 2A02:1205:5014:B210:8D59:2987:8812:2848 (talk) 01:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

There is a standard template for the specifications of military equipment - see Template:Infobox weapon. The article will most certainly be accepted by all if it is formatted like other MOWAG articles (Mowag Eagle) J.meija 137 20:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

MOWAG Shark

Hello, I didn't understand why you say this article looks like an advertisment. There is only the history and the tecnical datas written down. Also it couldent be seen as advertisment , because this vehicle never got in production. Also there are 3 interpendent sources listete 2 differend books from 2 aouthors from different publishers (see ISBN) and the informations aviable from the museum who has one of the prototypes in display. please get more specific what have to be improved so that i can fix it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1205:5014:B210:8D59:2987:8812:2848 (talk) 02:07, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LionMans Account (talk) 03:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Notability and reliability

Hi J.meija

I have edited this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JohnJohnson1008/Roozz.com#Request_review_at_WP:AFC I don't understand why it is not considered notable as I'm referencing several independent and reliable sources, such as TechCrunch, PCWorld and TheNextWeb?

I have now added references to every paragraph so the information is verifiable.

Can you give med specific suggestions for futher improvement?

Kind regards John JohnJohnson1008 (talk) 11:40, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Arne Ölander, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker^talk 16:47, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Karl Seubert.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Karl Seubert.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tomas Batuecas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Madrid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enrique Moles Ormella, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Madrid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Template:Chairmen of the Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

137Fy (talk) 17:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Wichers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montgomery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Canadian Reference Materials.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Canadian Reference Materials.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

References help

Thank you for your review J. I am struggling with how to go about improving/changing the references on the AG Hair post. See link below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/AG_Hair

Are you able to provide more specific feedback on what is not working or not notable and verifiable. From what I can tell the sources are quite significant for a Canadian manufacturer and distributor of professional hair products.

Thanks for your time and assistance. Heather — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heatherkennelly (talk • contribs) 21:50, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, J.meija. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Prof Raymond Leslie Martin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Prof Raymond Leslie Martin.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, J.meija. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IUPAP logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IUPAP logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 22 April 2023 (UTC)