Its-unused
Joined 25 March 2023
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Mz7 in topic Blocked as a sockpuppet
This is Its-unused's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hyperoperation list (March 25)
edit Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:15, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Its-unused!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:15, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
|
March 2023
editPlease stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Draft:Hyperoperation list, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 10:37, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- I delete
reject=yes
and enterreject=
. Its-unused (talk) 11:07, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Don't do that. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 11:44, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Aatt1-0 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aatt1-0. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Mz7 (talk) 09:48, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.