May 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Roundish. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mandaean Book of John, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. (Roundish t) 17:38, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Mandaean Book of John. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. DreamRimmer (talk) 17:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

I actually disagree with this explanation. The main problem with that edit is that you need a better source. This doesn't really support what you wrote, since it's one person's opinion. If you could get a news article with multiple people involved, that would be better. (Roundish t) 17:51, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
We The Mandaeans are a small community. I am from the priesthood leadership. They have misrepresented our book translation for political reasons. This opinion was published on our main website.
https://www.mandaeanunion.org/views/item/2366-reply-to-mr-h%C3%A4berl MandaeanHistoricalResearch (talk) 17:57, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 

Your recent editing history at Mandaean Book of John shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please do not use Wikipedia to right great wrongs that you might feel have been done. Content disputes should be discussed on the article talk page, Talk:Mandaean Book of John. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 00:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

We are the Mandaean community, we have the right to give our opinion on this misrepresentation which was done to the translation of our holy books. See our reference
http://www.mandaeanunion.com/views/item/2366-reply-to-mr-h%C3%A4berl
An edit war is not in our interest, but you also need to be neutral and not take a stand. MandaeanHistoricalResearch (talk) 06:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Mandaean Book of John edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mandaean Book of John, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion nomination of "Mandaean Book of John" edit

 

Mandaean Book of John, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. DarkAudit (talk) 06:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

This page contains no advertising or promotional material. The request came for deleting was based on the wrong reasons. MandaeanHistoricalResearch (talk) 06:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MandaeanHistoricalResearch edit

 

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:MandaeanHistoricalResearch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The request for speedy deletion is based on a false accusation and I do not have an advertisement in my account, while you are doing something wrong. MandaeanHistoricalResearch (talk) 12:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023 edit

 
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account from editing. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

It also appears that your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization, person or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest. You may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.
  • To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
  • If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken or in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

Thank you. Courcelles (talk) 12:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

IshkandaOfTheMandaeanHistoricalResearch (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I have changed the name according to your policy, please remove the block.

Accept reason:

I have renamed and unblocked your account. Welcome back. PhilKnight (talk) 17:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
MandaeanHistoricalResearch (talk) 13:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Mandaean Historical Research (May 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, IshkandaOfTheMandaeanHistoricalResearch! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Editing advice edit

You should read and follow the advice of WP:COI. PhilKnight (talk) 05:22, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, We are a closed community of more than 2000 Mandaeans people. You can see that on our Facebook page. this is more evidence of our research than an article written in a newspaper by someone for a little money. Our primary language is Arabic.
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100067759792013 IshkandaOfTheMandaeanHistoricalResearch (talk) 17:05, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Mandaean Historical Research edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Mandaean Historical Research, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 06:57, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply