User talk:Inter/Archive2022/April
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
New administrator activity requirement
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Carletteyt
I wouldn't even bother with a final warning, they've already been given three. At this point nothing short of an indef would be appropriate. CUPIDICAE馃挄 11:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Praxidicae Sadly that may be the case. Looking over their history, it does seem they are editing in good faith, it's just they do not seem to be willing to learn from feedback. Oz\InterAct 12:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
AIV report you declined
I blocked 1.46.146.12 (talk聽路 contribs聽路 WHOIS) for two weeks, your decline notwithstanding, because it had been indicated to be the latest incarnation of the Thai gun hoaxster, as indicated in the report (I know, it was subtle; I have made similar mistakes myself in the past and probably will in the future).
A lot of times these LTA socks look like they were reported too quickly. Remember in the future to read the report carefully before reaching a conclusion. Daniel Case (talk) 17:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case Got it! Oz\InterAct 17:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- OK, good. I also blocked Dracevec indefinitely as NOTHERE. You had declined the report on the grounds that the edits were infrequent, and indeed they were, but his talk page showed, as the reporting editor noted, several instances of level 4/final warnings in the last couple of days, and his overall history showed that he was here to push a nationalist POV. Daniel Case (talk) 17:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case Thanks for letting me know, I'll add it to the experience bucket. Oz\InterAct 17:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- OK, good. I also blocked Dracevec indefinitely as NOTHERE. You had declined the report on the grounds that the edits were infrequent, and indeed they were, but his talk page showed, as the reporting editor noted, several instances of level 4/final warnings in the last couple of days, and his overall history showed that he was here to push a nationalist POV. Daniel Case (talk) 17:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
2604:3d09:a784:3d00:f988:609:c4df:5a19
Hello, thanks for blocking this address, but for IPV6 addresses like that one, please just block the /64. See the relevant block log. Also in this case there was other similar editing by other Canadian IP's in the page history. Graham87 14:57, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Also see a similar thread I recently started on Daniel Case's talk page. Graham87 15:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Regarding WikiFlame50
I didn't mean that I thought it was an issue, it just seems to be how they usually respond, to blank it and respond in the edit summary. They do respond promptly. Maybe just some guidance on how to use their talkpage effectively and tips on how to archive stuff would go a lot further? I'm just not sure that they need to be blocked at this point. Nobody seems to have really raised the issue with them previously. Just my 50c from the peanut gallery. Mako001聽(C)聽聽(T)聽 馃嚭馃嚘 14:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
ANI+pblock situation that you handled has resumed
The Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#5644Khorasani pblock has expired and the editor has resumed trying to force their edit through on the target page, while refusing to participate in the content discussion about it. I don't have time to do anything admin about it at the moment. But figured I'd ping you since it was your pblock and subsequent closure of the ANI thread. DMacks (talk) 15:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thank you very much for blocking that Nazi! It's really a relief to see that people actually care and will speedily respond. 饾暩饾枟 饾暯饾枈饾枂饾枆饾枎饾枔饾枌 饾暱饾枤饾枟饾枡饾枒饾枈 馃嚭馃嚘馃嚭馃嚘馃嚭馃嚘 (talk) 18:49, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Longer term block
Hi, thanks for the block on 209.91.198.48聽(talk聽路 contribs聽路 deleted聽contribs聽路 filter聽log聽路 WHOIS聽路 RDNS聽路 RBLs聽路 http聽路 block聽user聽路 block聽log). Looking at their contributions it looks like they've been doing this for *years*. See this edit for example. I would've added this to the original AIV report but I only noticed it afterwards. The IP was blocked for 31 hours in October 2020 and I don't see any other meaningful contributions, would a more longer term block be in order here? FozzieHey (talk) 19:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)