InsiderChiari
Read before editing! edit
There is consensus for "Pop, country, rock" for Red (album) on Wikipedia. Here are the links: 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Red_(Taylor_Swift_album)/Archive_1#RfC:_Changing_to_genre_for_Taylor_Swift_%E2%80%93_%E2%80%9CRed%E2%80%9D_to_Pop_%E2%80%A2_country%E2%80%A2_rock 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Red_(Taylor_Swift_album)/Archive_1#RfC:_Should_%22country%22_be_kept_as_a_genre_in_the_infobox?
So, do not act against the consensus. If you want to contest the consensus, open up a formal Rfc discussion as per Wikipedia guidelines. Until then, you must not edit the version of the article pertaining to the established consensus; otherwise, your actions constitute edit warring, which may lead to you losing your edit privileges. 136.233.9.107 (talk) 07:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
November 2022 edit
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Enchanted (Taylor Swift song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ippantekina (talk) 10:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
November 2022 edit
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Anti-Hero, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I strongly advise you to stop playing with the genres of infoboxes. Your contributions show a history of ONLY genre-related edits, and it is very disruptive as the vast majority of your edits are either improperly sourced, backed by no source, or purely original research. Your activity is highly reminiscent of a textbook genre warrior. So please do not mess with genres, and try to obtain consensus in respective talk pages before changing them. I see that another editor has already advised you to be careful. If you persist with this disruptive and exhausting way of editing, all of your contributions could be instantly reverted without explanation. Regards. ℛonherry☘ 18:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Right right I mean they are actually all sourced but if you feel like reverting them for no reason then go ahead. "Source calls the album electropop, not the song." Looks like you didn't read the whole article, buddy. :) InsiderChiari (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- No, they are NOT sourced. On Wikipedia, you are not required to read a source, you are required to understand it. "Sourcing" isn't simply adding a citation to a word in the article to show the cited website has the word. A source is still a wrong source if the prose of the article doesn't 100% convey the same thing the citation says. A slight alteration between the source's factoid and the article's prose over the same subject still means UNSOURCED. The Ringer article never calls Anti-Hero "an electropop song". You ASSUMED it's electropop just because a line said "But it all comes down to the moment when most of the smeary electro-pop drops out and Taylor sings the chorus again." Electro-pop drops out of what? the production? of the whole song? or just the chorus? This is why WP:EXPLICITGENRE exists. To educate genre-warriors like you about what actually constitutes a song's genre in the infobox/prose. Please try to take advice and correct yourself, and avoid sassing at editors who are trying to help you. You have been reverted by not just me, but several other editors over the past few days. Do not continue this disruptive activity if you want to keep editing. Regards. ℛonherry☘ 21:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
If the electropop drops out, it had to have been there in the first place, thus it is an electropop song.. it's pretty clear you didn't read the whole article initially and saw the album being called electropop and assumed that's what I was trying to source from.. and even then that was way more explicit than "Swift and Antonoff's production details make the song soar, ensuring that every criticism arrives in a sleek, shiny pop-rock vessel" or "the song sounds like the collision of three different Swift eras: There's the lacquered synth-pop of 1989…" but ok.. I don't know why you are so worked up about this anyways… InsiderChiari (talk) 21:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi @InsiderChiari: There's another one mentioned Kelly Clarkson's song Catch My Breath. 2402:1980:82E7:2B93:0:0:0:1 (talk) 04:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)