Regarding edits to Korean American edit

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Inseong! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule photobucket\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 00:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Korean American. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. cab 03:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:Pinochio.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Pinochio.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:Pinouk.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Pinouk.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate images uploaded edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Pinouk.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Pinochio.jpg. The copy called Image:Pinochio.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 03:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Joinseong.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Joinseong.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 211.221.212.168 (talk) 10:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pinouk edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pinouk, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — Xavier, 21:43, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply