User talk:Innotata/Archive23
- This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
January 2018 edit
The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2018 edit
- News and notes: Communication is key
- In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
- Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
- Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
- Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers
- Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
- Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
TFA edit
Thank you for Cape sparrow! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
February 2018 edit
The Signpost: 5 February 2018 edit
- Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
- Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
- Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
- Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
- In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
- Humour: You really are in Wonderland
Precious anniversary edit
 | |
| sparrows and Olympic marmot | |
|---|---|
| ... you were recipient no. 1577 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for today's Sind sparrow, a "somewhat obscure bird"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:27, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLII, February 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2018 edit
- News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
- Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
- Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
- Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
- Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
- Technology report: Paragraph-based edit conflict screen; broken thanks
March 2018 edit
Draft:Paola Prestini concern edit
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Paola Prestini, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive edit
G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
- updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.
For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018 edit
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
April 2018 edit
Your draft article, Draft:Paola Prestini edit
Hello, Innotata. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paola Prestini".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2018 edit
- From the editors: The Signpost's presses roll again
- Signpost: Future directions for The Signpost
- In the media: The rise of Wikipedia as a disinformation mop
- In focus: Admin reports board under criticism
- Special report: ACTRIAL results adopted by landslide
- Community view: It's time we look past Women in Red to counter systemic bias
- Discussion report: The future of portals
- Arbitration report: No new cases, and one motion on administrative misconduct
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Military History
- Traffic report: A quiet place to wrestle with the articles of March
- Technology report: Coming soon: Books-to-PDF, interactive maps, rollback confirmation
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
May 2018 edit
Passer Montanus edit
Innotata said: "unneeded and "messes up image formatting."" A more objective reason for deleting an image which illustrates the variation of a species depending on its habitat would be welcome. Bengt Nyman (talk) 07:48, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Bengt Nyman: - I think that is fairly justified and should not be taken personally, there are really a large number of images of the tree sparrow on Commons and several of the subspecies are already illustrated, and nominate montanus already has a photo showing all the features clearly (unlike the ruffled one added). Further, there is no reason to add an image in the lead text of an article, especially a well-developed one (like this one which is a featured article). Shyamal (talk) 15:12, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
- Exactly, and putting an image in the lead section pushes down all the images in the sections below for most readers. —innotata 18:15, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
- Shyamal, that sounds reasonable. Innotata's comment, however: "unneeded and "messes up image formatting," is a poor explanation for his action and is not what any Wikimedia contributor wants to hear. Bengt Nyman (talk) 18:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
- I was just trying to be to the point—there's a character limit—and in my opinion one should consider where in the article photos should be placed etc. when adding them, and one shouldn't take personally whether a photo is the best to illustrate a topic for which many quality choices exist. —innotata 01:55, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Shyamal, that sounds reasonable. Innotata's comment, however: "unneeded and "messes up image formatting," is a poor explanation for his action and is not what any Wikimedia contributor wants to hear. Bengt Nyman (talk) 18:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 9 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Long-billed curlew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sand crab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 May 2018 edit
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
June 2018 edit
The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 June 2018 edit
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
July 2018 edit
The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Monk parakeet - bats edit
Hi, I have added, that feral monk parakeets in Spain are a threat to local bat population, you undid the editing, maybe because it was not sourced properly. This was based on the part https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_noctule_bat#Threats in the Greater noctule bat article. Information is true, the parakeets are a threat to bats.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/10/science/parakeets-bats-invasive-species.html
As I am new and this was one of my few contributions, maybe first signed, to English wiki, I am not sure how to add it properly.
Sorry for disturbing,
Yours Bojinda
Bojindus (talk) 09:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Bojindus: You should always feel free to add information with a source. I took a look at that New York Times article, though, and it's about rose-ringed parakeets, not monk parakeets. —innotata 15:32, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
You are invited! Join us on Saturday, July 28 at the Quatrefoil Library edit
| Wiki Loves Pride 2018 at the Quatrefoil Library | ||
|---|---|---|
 |
|
|
Invitation to WMUG Zoom Meeting and Doodle Poll edit
Hello innotata,
Below is a Doodle poll to schedule our first WMUG Zoom meeting.
https://doodle.com/poll/4xnxiqqmq4pvzw7n
Susan J will be on vacation for the rest of July, so I have listed possible dates and times for our first meeting in August.
Evening hours were requested to accommodate folx' working schedules, so I kept it to that. Please respond to the Doodle poll as soon as you are able so that we can get this on our calendars.
If there is anything that you want to add to the meeting agenda, please let me know. My focus for the meeting will be to compile questions about leadership, funding structure, and planning for WMUG.
Also, if you are no longer involved with the Wikipedia community or taking a break from it and do not want to be included in these emails--or if there is someone that is still missing from this list who you think should be included--please let me know.
Sincerely,
RachelWex (Rachel Wexelbaum)
Sind sparrow scheduled for TFA edit
This is to let you know that I've scheduled Sind sparrow to appear on the main page as today's featured article on August 28, 2018. If you need to make tweaks to the blurb, it is at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 28, 2018. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 July 2018 edit
- From the editor: If only if
- Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
August 2018 edit
The Bugle: Issue CXLVIII, August 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2018 edit
- From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend
- In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles
- Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Special report: Wikimania 2018
- Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits
- Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work
- Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies
- Humour: Signpost editor censors herself
- From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words
September 2018 edit
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open edit
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIX, September 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced edit
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced edit
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.
A. C. N. Nambiar HELP edit
Please can you help me put together and re edit the page as you undid muy edit citing- Appears copied from source.Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.30.96.30 (talk) 11:59, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Have your say! edit
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
October 2018 edit
The Signpost: 1 October 2018 edit
- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
Disambiguation link notification for October 3 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ostrich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rhea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2018 edit
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
November 2018 edit
The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Innotata. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
(Henry) Eliot Howard edit
Hi Innotata,
recently I found the article on (Henry) Eliot Howard. I was a bit surprised that part of his name was not mentioned in the article title, and made the suggestion to change this on the talk page. Now I find that you changed the name in 2014, from Henry Eliot Howard to Eliot Howard, with the note (in the edit summary) "mostly known and credited as such, as stated in article already". Well. It is a bit confusing, but his full name was Henry Eliot Howard, and his name is often used as such, and also in different ways. Take for instance the important book of Burkhardt jr. (2005) Patterns of Behavior, which only mentions the full name. And see the examples of authority-files I gave on the talkpage. Apart from that, I don't find any sources for the statement in the article itself about the use of his name. O the contrary. For instance in s:en:The British Warblers A History with Problems of Their Lives the name H. Eliot Howard is used on the title page. So please, let me know what your thoughts are about this. I want to suggest to change the article name back to Henry Eliot Howard, as you understand. But I first wanted to discuss this with you.
I'm working on Edmund Selous, especially on en-wikisource. See s:Author:Edmund Selous -> the first articles he published in The Zoologist. Howard also wrote in The Zoologist, and as you can see, his British Warblers are also on Wikisource (in a far from finished state!)
By the way: on Thomas Mills more or less the same thing: his full name is Thomas Wesley Mills, and it is often Wesley Mills, or T. Wesley Mills. I think the full name should be used here as well.
Many (birdwatching) greetings from the Netherlands, --Dick Bos (talk) 07:26, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Dick Bos: First let me make sure you know, some people were known by simply their second and family names, even in the Anglosphere. Wikipedia article titles don't have to use full names when they weren't the names someone was most widely known by; on the other hand VIAF, DNB, etc. frequently spell out even very long full names. That leaves how people are credited and how they are referred to in biographical sources. Howard is credited as Eliot Howard in all his books I checked, but as you note some sources on him use only his full name. The ODNB says (Henry) Eliot Howard, indicating he was mostly known as Eliot Howard. So not a clear-cut case, but it makes some sense to move it back to his full name.
- Thomas Mills should definitely be moved to either Wesley Mills or Thomas Wesley Mills in that case!
- (In another style note, Jr is not considered to be part of someone's last name so don't use it as such in citations in articles please.) Cheers, —innotata 00:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 edit
The Signpost: 1 December 2018 edit
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards edit
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia Day 2019 edit
There's discussion at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Minnesota of a celebration in the Twin Cities on January 19. It would be great if that fits your schedule. Jonathunder (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards edit
Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2018 edit
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again