Ape fight moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Ape fight, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 10:13, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ape Fight (June 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 22:59, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Inkpistachio! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 22:59, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

January 2020 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Slipper, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Woodlot (talk) 13:17, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Edits to Banagher edit

With regard to your recent contribution to the article on Banagher, please note that this article is rated as a Good Article. It would not be so if it was full of mistakes. Whilst constructive changes are welcome, you should develop a better understanding of language constructs and use before attempting to edit Good Articles. You should also familiarise yourself with the Wikipedia MOS.Corcs999 (talk) 09:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply