This is InkQuill's talk page. Fighting for truth, accuracy and the First Amendment.

Welcome!

edit
Hello InkQuill! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!  Netsnipe  ►  07:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Orange Metro North Station

edit

you are right to want to work it out, but it is best for all here or on the article's talk page. That way others can learn/participate. I will continue to respond here or there. You can also use my talk page (you write on my talk page, I'll answer on yours).

Briefly, for now, I am originally from the area, but the only "axe" I have is against plans that are not reality. If they build it (the Orange station) I would use it as an alternate to driving to Woodmont (from New York). I like the idea. It would be good for me. But plans in transportation often get a lot of talk, without anything getting built. Look at Route 34. Or the extension of commuter rail to Hartford.

One of the quickest ways we can decide that the section should stay is to find out exactly what the initial money was appropriated for. We should establish that this is more than planning money, and that there is a real timetable, etc, which may not be so easy. Has there even been an EIS?

After that, the question of "why Orange" comes up. And this part is much tougher. We are not allowed to guess why Orange gets a station, and claim that it is fact. We are not allowed to "figure it out" That is called Original Research on Wikipedia, and also not allowed. We'd need someone in authority, or a Reliable Source to say, explicitly, Orange will have a station because we want every town to have a station, or that this is an official policy, or something like that. Otherwise, couldn't this just be a convenient spot between the long gap from Milford Center to West Haven? Jd2718 05:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

There are two separate questions: 1)Will these things be built? and 2) Are these two towns getting stations because they don't have them?
Second question first. If we have a sentence that says there are plans for stations in West Haven and Orange, followed by the fact that these are the only two towns on the New Haven line without stations, we are implying cause and effect. And we are not allowed to make a claim of cause and effect if we do not have a Reliable Source that says so.
Will they be built? It sounds like a debate, not a done deal. If it is this time an active debate (the proposal for at least a West Haven station has been floated many times in the past), then we should source it, and indicate what stage the discussion is in. If it is a done deal, that should be sourced and indicated.
Transportation plans are floated all the time, and die all the time. If there is a budget issue, they see the first cuts. It is not a good idea to include plans that are not yet definite.
Finally, I regret that I tried to rebut transportation details. However, while not directly relevant to the article, the questions have been opened up.
Do Marsh Hill Road and Lambert Road function as a single roadway? Do they have the same physical characteristics? No. Do they carry similar traffic volumes? No. Does most of the traffic on Lambert continue on to Marsh Hill? No. Vice versa? No. (From a layman's point of view, when giving directions it would be necessary to tell someone not to turn off)
Who would the Orange Station serve? There are simply many many more times as many people in proximity to that location who live in West Haven and Milford than who live in Orange.
Is Marsh Hill Road a major road? Of course! You misquoted me on the article's talk page. That was wrong. Marsh Hill Road functions as a major access from the Post Road to 95. It is a sort of hybrid between an on-ramp and a street. You called Marsh Hill a major north south road serving Orange. That would be different. We have several streets that do that (all carrying considerably more traffic than Lambert)
You wrote "the only road that Orange residents can use to get to I-95" which is just wrong. The other entrances may not be in Orange, but there is no town loyalty in selecting highway access. (40,42, Merritt to the Connector, even via Route 8)
Finally, it is town centers, in general, that have stations. Walking distance to the Green clearly counts. The quick comparison (all other towns have one) is in this sense misleading. Jd2718 14:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Didn't mean to offend you. Polaron is providing source on the legislation. Didn't realize I needed to say ok. The latest rewrite though is better. As better sources are located, the paragraph will continue to improve (which might be expanding it, shrinking it, or modifying it). If you are going to keep editing, it might be worthwhile to assume that your fellow editors are intelligent and are acting on good faith. This did not start out well. Your sources did not say what you said they did. You implied that you had unique local knowledge that made only you qualified to describe the street network, you responded with several factually inaccurate statements.
But starting out on the wrong foot doesn't condemn one to stay there. The section is better-sourced and more accurately written now. Other editors have become involved. And finally, local knowledge is invaluable. It just can't be used as a cudgel in disputes. Jd2718 02:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough, but not too fond of Sloppy Jose's. You saw what Polaron found? We'll reword to reflect that information. Jd2718 04:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Toni Morrison

edit

The categories were removed because they were deleted by the consensus of the Wikipedians through the process of Category for Discussion. CFD (I think you meant this) is the process of proposing the deletion, merge or rename of a category. For more details, see the link above. Anyway, you did an error when you say "Using CFB". It was "per CFD using AWB". AWB is a semiautomated wikipedia editing program. It allows you to quickly change hundreds of pages. I use it to remove deleted categories and substitute renamed ones. Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk) on 18:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Succession of Bishops of the Episcopal Church in the United States

edit

Thanks for your additions and corrections! Bit by bit we're getting this article looking presentable!

b. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bpmullins (talkcontribs) 06:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC). (The bot beat me to the signature - sorry! - Bpmullins | TalkReply

Aaargh. I may need to fix my displayed name -- b and p are my first and middle initials -- I'd never even thought that somebody might mistake it for "Bp." (!) Go right ahead with your work on the individual dioceses - those contributions are appreciated. I'd offer one warning (which I already have on the Talk page) - you don't start counting (and adding roman numerals) for the bishops until they actually become a diocesan. Check the numbers for the Bishops of Hawaii for an example - they've just elected their fifth, but Ed Browning is shown as VIII Hawaii. A previous editor took that from another site which didn't understand the rules. Thanks again for the help. -- Bpmullins | Talk 18:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
If you look at your copy of the Red Book and count from the first English bishop (and omit the suffragan) you get eight for Browning. There are other dioceses in the west that have similar things - they were missionary dioceses for part of their history. As far as the talk, I guess it's just the way the software works... b. Bpmullins | Talk 06:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi - would you doublecheck my last edit to make sure I didn't wipe out anything of yours? You accidentally overwrote some of mine; I reverted but I want to make sure that I didn't lose anything. -- BPMullins | Talk 05:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi - I notice that you changed my entry for Starkey from Northern New Jersey to Newark. My choice there was deliberate: when he was consecrated the diocese was indeed called Northern NJ. I've been attempting to track the various changes in the names of the dioceses in the table. In my sources, he was identified as NNJ. There are many other changes as well; Northern California and Northern Michigan were known by those names when they were missionary districts but General Convention imposed the see city's name (Sacramento and Marquette) when they became dioceses. Both later reverted to their original names. -- BPMullins | Talk 18:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits to Hartford

edit

I recently changed some of the Hartford, CT article, which you deleted. These changes involved adding some photos of Hartford landmarks (standard practice for wikipedia articles). If you had problems with the formatting, thats one thing. But you completely got rid of some very helpful photographs, and reverted back to the old version, which has, in my opinion too many skyline photographs (1 is enough, and there is far more to show about hartford). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.222.210.165 (talk) 20:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC).Reply

Tweed Airport

edit

I added my reply to the discussion you started on Tweed Airport. -chris^_^ 22:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Once again, I provided the link that I already provided. -chris^_^ 05:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
I placed my answer. And why don't you read the discussion page on the link I provided twice. -chris^_^ 02:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ecunet Logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:21, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Orphaned non-free media (Image:Blue Ecunet Logo.gif)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Blue Ecunet Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Seinfeld article

edit

pls check the article now...i've left some notes on talk page about improving the article. pls leave ur feedback on the talk page....thanx...Gprince007 (talk) 15:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Perhaps next week, when I'm on vacation I'll spend some time with it. I'm glad we're on a track to make this a good Wiki article. I haven't had time lately (not that I ever really do) because my father-in-law died. Today was the funeral. So I don't have energy right now.

Let me ask a question, though, while I'm here. I have this secret desire to create a Seinfeld index. It would be something like:

"Get out!" ... The Pushpin, The Molecular Disease

Uncle Leo ... The Bookstore

You get the idea. It would make it easy to cross-reference things that are in one episode and referenced in another. I'll never do it, because I don't have the time. But is this sort of thing ever done on Wikipedia? I don't think I've ever seen anything like that. InkQuill (talk) 02:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Reply

edit

Sorry, but as I've posted on my talk page, "Comments will be deleted once issues are resolved." I did not think that you expected a response from your comments and went ahead and removed them. RabidWolf (talk) 21:01, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Seinfeld WikiProject

edit

Thankyou for joining the Seinfeld WikiProject. Here are a few things you can do:

  • Recruit more members. (Try inviting frequent editors to articles to do with Seinfeld; check article history pages).
  • Add this template to all Seinfeld-related articles and this template to their talk pages. (A bot may be able to do this).
  • Assess articles related Seinfeld for class and importance.
  • Or just start improving articles!

It's up to you what you choose to do as a member of the project. Anyway, thanks again for joining. Joelster (talk) 23:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Community you say.

edit

Since you read my talk page than here's a proposal. I'll stop with my problems if you have anymore ideas on moving forward. I know my comments and I'm straight forward with my comments. If we are a community than really share the ideas. How hard is that be? I like that you show me that you can make a table but shouldn't really disagree about anything else. If you want me to be a good editor, then put your idea on the Seinfeld talk page and be more human with the way you reply to me because I'll never go away. I'll end it if you have ideas for the community. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 01:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure what you want me to do. I am trying to talk about issues, but every edit doesn't require a vote. We had a discussion about editing here. Note that it was not only me who objected to your approach and disagreed with your belief that we were being too "encyclopedic." — InkQuill 02:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's enough already. I don't wanna talk about this anymore. You're referencing to my past so many times I think it's about time to let it go ok? If you continue to reference my past with the things that I ad-libbed through the Seinfeld history then you better work on your approach that I am not "encyclopedic". That everything has to be perfect. This better be a deal. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 22:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's fine with me not to talk about it anymore. I didn't start complaining about you to others. I was just trying to point out that your anger with me is misplaced. I'm just editing the article the way I believe Wikipedia is supposed to be edited. That's all, really. — InkQuill 22:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your conflict with User:Johnnyauau2000

edit

Well i guess u know the story here...Johny asked me for help regarding ur edits and i posted reply on his talk page. As u r the more experienced editor i am requesting u to display some statesmanship and stay cool and not destroy the article by bickering over who did what in the article. your suggestions on seinfeld talk page seem ok...i'll go thru it later and reply to it but for now i suggest u read WP:COOL to cool down a bit. The article lacks in many areas and its sad to see u guys bickering over trivial matters. The article lacks citation and sources...i suggest we resolve those issues first and then get to other matters.....Gprince007 (talk) 11:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I guess my comments show more emotion than I'm feeling. I haven't been engaging in any editing wars or anything and haven't engaged in any ad hominem attacks. The changes I made were because I thought the article needed them. I agree with you that it's not helpful to bicker and I'll try not to engage in it. Thanks for trying to help. Now about "bombastic" ...   — InkQuill 18:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nice to know that i helped in cooling down the heat here !!!....when u said "little boxes on my user page" i guess u were talking about userboxes. Well u also have userboxes on ur page so i guess u know abt them....episode pages are pretty ok i guess...u can keep adding wikiproject seinfeld tag to the episode article talk pages....The individual episodes articles look ok to me....i've seen them and barring maybe a few, all others are in reasonably good shape. Maybe a little copyedit might help.....Well "Bombastic" might be a common word in daily usage but i certainly dont think it is "encyclopeadic" enough...but then maybe its a case of american english Vs commonwealth english or the british english(which i guess is the one spoken by johny and me)....anyways i feel bombastic doesnt sound good...maybe some other synonym may be used which sounds better and more "encyclopaedic"....Gprince007 (talk) 18:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Actually, I think the episode pages need a lot of work. There is trivia on a lot of them that needs to be incorporated or removed, just for starters. — InkQuill 19:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

LoCE

edit

Hi InkQuill, I wasn't sure you'd see my reply to your query at the LoCE talk page, and I was hoping to recruit you. Here's what I said: "The basic guide for style is the Wikipedia Manual of Style (WP:MOS), and it differs to some degree from the Associated Press style or the Chicago Manual and others. I always refer to it when I'm unsure about a style question, and this typically happens several times a day. The MOS doesn't answer every question clearly, but with your level of experience, you'll be able to sort out the reasonable from the unreasonable and the logical from the illogical in most cases. Not everyone editing Wikipedia is familiar with the style manual, and that accounts for much of the inconsistency that you are seeing. That inconsistency, among other things, is why the encyclopedia needs us. The basic punctuation guidelines can be quickly reached via the shortcut WP:PUNC. The main guideline on the use of quotation marks is found under the subhead, "Inside or outside". It says, "Punctuation marks are placed inside the quotation marks only if the sense of the punctuation is part of the quotation (this system is referred to as logical quotation)." This is the opposite of AP style and seems wrong at first to someone who has been doing it the other way. The main punctuation guideline isn't related to an article's nationality, if we can speak of such a thing, but other style questions sometimes are, such as the spelling of words such as center in U.S.-related articles and centre if the article is UK-related. Most of the exceptions to the main guidelines can be found in the MOS or other sub-guidelines attached to it. The MOS, like the rest of the encyclopedia, is somewhat flexible and is subject to periodic revision, and sometimes heated disagreements occur among editors about particular points. Someone with your experience would be a valuable "catch" for the League, and I hope you will join us. Please let me know here or on my user talk page if I can be of any assistance." Finetooth (talk) 16:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Presiding bishops

edit

Hi. Generally an article shouldn't belong both in a category and in that category's parent. All presiding bishops of ECUSA are necessarily bishops of ECUSA, so ++Katherine's article can't be in both. The Wednesday Island (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I understand your point, which was brought up here. Roundhouse0 was sympathetic to my point of view, and you said "generally," so let me tell you why I think they should be both. I see categories as an index. It seems less than helpful, if I want to see the list of all articles on U.S. Episcopal bishops, that I have to look in the category and then each subcategory. One is a subset of the other, so to my mind the presiding bishops should be in both. I don't see anything negative to doing that. In any case, you should be consistent. There are 26 PB's, most of them with both categories. How come no one wants to remove William White from the bishop category? How about the PBs that no one ever heard of? They're not going to find them if they look in the bishops category. I hope I've persuaded you to put +Katharine back in bishops. Otherwise, have fun removing the category from the other PBs!  ~ InkQuill  02:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
We are not the end-user nor the "raison d'etre" of Wikipedia. It's the researchers and students that increasingly rely on it as a source of information. From their point of view, in order to make it easier for them to use, PB's should appear on both lists. All PB's are B's, but not all B's are PB's. I agree with InkQuill.Pr4ever (talk) 02:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

My stub template for bishops. Edit if there is basic info you think should be here.

edit

The Right Reverend xx xx (November 30, 1729February 25, 1796), was the first bishop of Connecticut in the Episcopal Church in the United States of America.

==Biography-- xx xx was born in Groton, Connecticut on October 5, 1729. His father, ...

xx graduated from Yale in 1748; was ordained deacon by the bishop of Lincoln and priest by the bishop of Carlisle in 1753; was rector of Christ Church, New Brunswick, New Jersey from 1754 to 1757, rector in Jamaica, New York from 1757 to 1766, and of St Peter's, Westchester (now annexed to The Bronx) from 1766 to 1775. xx was elected bishop on March 25, 1783. He was consecrated at X Cathedral on November 14, 1784. He died in New London on February 25, 1796, and is buried at St. James Church.

====Consecrators----

xx xx was the 1st bishop consecrated for the Episcopal Church.

==See also--

(only PB):* List of Presiding Bishops in the Episcopal Church in the United States of America

==References--

  • The Episcopal Church Annual. Morehouse Publishing: New York, NY (2005).

==External links--

Preceded by
1st Bishop of Connecticut
November 14, 17841796
Succeeded by
Preceded by 2nd Presiding Bishop
October 5, 1789September 8, 1792
Succeeded by

{{Anglican-bishop-stub {{US-bishop-stub {{AfricanAmerican-stub {{Florida-bio-stub {{Oregon-bio-stub {{Texas-bio-stub {{Utah-bio-stub


Category:1729 births Category:1796 deaths Category:People from Connecticut Category:Bishops of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America Category:Presiding Bishops of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America

I meant to add the anglican bishop template but forgot, have now added that. I do apologize. With regard to the template above. If this is for Bishops of the Episcopal church the US-Christian-clergy, Christian-bio, reli-bio, US-bio, Anglican and bio are all redundent and anglican-bishop-stub should be used. Waacstats (talk) 19:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I got your reply about Mickey Abbot.

edit

I don't how to put this but why do you want to merge minor characters like Mickey into the Minor Character section? I'd agree with you but we still need to discuss it with Gprince007 and to make it work. Remember you put it in the Seinfeld talk page? Anyway, should you want to delete it or redirect it, consider the consequences from other editors who put their hard work on it. Well, I can't stop you but please respond to my question soon. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 00:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't want to interrupt here but lets stop arguing. First and foremost, InkQuill doesn't need to get advance permission from other editors from the Seinfeld WikiProject if he (sorry for presuming your gender) wants to edit an article within the project scope. Wikipedia encourages boldness and no one editor has authority over an article. Secondly, we can reach a happy medium if we all respect each other's views and don't resort to personal attacks (which it almost has). Let's also keep in mind the etiquette policy. The project will be better off if we all do. Joelster (talk) 01:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for stepping in, Joelster (and yes, I'm a he). I'd just like to say that I posted a Merger proposal on January 26. Three persons commented and I took into account their comments. I've been merging articles ever since with no objection until now. I'm not arguing, just pointing out that I believe I've followed the etiquette policy. Thanks again for the support.  ~ InkQuill  03:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay sorry about the etiquette policy thing. I wasn't specifically referring to anyone, but you certainly have followed it thus far. Good work! Joelster (talk) 04:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I understand. Next time, if you have anything else in mind, put it in the Seinfeld talk, Gprince007 and me so that I don't end up thinking "What's happening?" and "Why it's happening?" Excuse my sarcasm but hey! Anyway, thanks. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 07:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Johnny, that's what I did in January. Please read the talk page.  ~ InkQuill  15:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Didnt know that their was a conflict brewing on here....but glad that the issue has been resolved amicably !!!!....i guess its irrelevant now but still u can see my response here.Gprince007 (talk) 15:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar for you!

edit
 (the star has been relocated
to my user page) 
The WikiProject Barnstar
Awarded to InkQuill for his excellent work as a member of the Seinfeld WikiProject and for keeping a cool head during disputes. Truly an experienced editor. Joelster (talk) 21:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Gee, thanks! I'm honored.  ~ InkQuill  22:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanx for the Barnstar

edit

Thanx for the "Barnstar of Peace"....glad to know that i can contribute to a peaceful dispute-resolution process...I can see that u also have been awarded a barnstar for contribution to Seinfeld wikiproject....Congrats to u too !!! Gprince007 (talk) 15:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

:)

edit

Sorry for the misunderstanding - Joelster (talk) 03:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you - Diocese of Dallas, Bishop Suffragan

edit

I didn't even think of editing the page! And I was at the cathedral during convention! I'm glad somebody thought of it! Sarum blue (talk) 00:41, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. My little contribution.  ~ InkQuill  01:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bishop succession page moved

edit

Did you see this one? There appears to have been a discussion over at a WikiProject Lists and they decided to move the article. They don't appear to have consulted any of the regular editors on the article, though. I think they missed the point about the article - it's more than just a list since the important content is the succession. What do you think? -- BPMullins | Talk 18:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Christianity

edit
You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

 

- Tinucherian (talk) 10:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

RFK

edit

Replied to your comment on the assassination talk page Fritzpoll (talk) 15:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Redesigning the Seinfeld Project Page

edit

Hello InkQuill. I have been working on redesigning the main page for the Seinfeld WikiProject at this page. So before I went on and changed the main page, I wanted to ask all the members how they felt about it. So could you take a look at it and give any suggestions to improving it at here. Thank You. --Gman124 talk 16:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of UCHUG

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is UCHUG. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UCHUG. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Ecunet Logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Ecunet Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Edit Summaries, Please

edit

Please use edit summaries, which you recently omitted at List of Episcopal bishops‎. If you had simply said "added ian douglas", I and others wouldn't have bothered to click on it to see what you did. Thanks, . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 10:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

List of Beatles songs with U.K. and U.S. albums

edit

Table

edit
Title Year U.K. album U.S. album Author(s) Lead vocal(s) Chart position UK Chart position US Notes
"12-Bar Original" 1965 Lennon, McCartney, Harrison and Starkey N/A instrumental
"A Beginning" 1968 [[George

Martin|Martin]]

N/A instrumental
"A Day in the Life" 1967 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon, with McCartney 63 B-side
"A Hard Day's Night" 1964 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon and McCartney 1 1
"A Hard Day's Night (instrumental)" 1964 Lennon, with McCartney George Martin and His Orchestra
"A Shot of Rhythm and Blues" 1963 Terry Thompson Lennon Cover
"A Taste of Honey" 1963 Scott, Marlow McCartney Cover
"A World Without Love" 1964 McCartney McCartney Single by

Peter and Gordon, February 1964

"Across the Universe" 1968 Lennon Lennon
"Act Naturally" 1965 Russell, Morrison Starkey 47 Cover, B-side
"Ain't She Sweet" 1961 Yellen,

Ager

Lennon 19 Cover. A 1969 recording appears on Anthology 3
"All I've Got to Do" 1963 Lennon Lennon
"All My Loving" 1963 McCartney McCartney 45
"All Things Must Pass" 1969 Harrison Harrison
"All Together Now" 1967 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney, with Lennon
"All You Need Is Love" 1967 Lennon Lennon 1 1
"And I Love Her" 1964 McCartney McCartney 12
"And I Love Her (instrumental)" 1964 McCartney George Martin and His Orchestra
"And Your Bird Can Sing" 1966 Lennon Lennon
"Anna (Go to Him)" 1963 [[Arthur

Alexander|Alexander]]

Lennon Cover
"Another Girl" 1965 McCartney McCartney
"Another Hard Day's Night (instrumental)" 1965 Lennon, with McCartney, arr. Ken Thorne
"Any Time at All" 1964 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon, with McCartney
"Ask Me Why" 1962 Lennon Lennon B-side
"Baby It's You" 1963 [[Burt

Bacharach|Bacharach]], David, Williams

Lennon 7 67 Cover of a

proclaimers song; the BBC version charted in the UK

"Baby, You're a Rich Man" 1967 Lennon and McCartney Lennon 1 34 B-Side
"Baby's in Black" 1964 Lennon and McCartney Lennon and McCartney
"Back in the U.S.S.R." 1968 McCartney McCartney 19
"Bad Boy" 1965 Williams Lennon Cover
"Bad to Me" 1963 Lennon Lennon Single by Billy J Kramer with the Dakotas, July 1963
"Because" 1969 Lennon Lennon, McCartney, and Harrison
"Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!" 1967 Lennon Lennon
"Bésame Mucho" 1962 Velázquez McCartney Cover
"Birthday" 1968 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney, with Lennon
"Blackbird" 1968 McCartney McCartney
"Blue Jay Way" 1967 Harrison Harrison
"Boys" 1963 Dixon, Farrell Starkey (Best) Cover
"Can't Buy Me Love" 1964 McCartney McCartney 1 1
"Carnival of Light" 1967 McCartney N/A
"Carol" 1963 Berry Lennon Cover
"Carry That Weight" 1969 McCartney Lennon, McCartney, Harrison, and Starkey
"Catswalk" 1962 N/A instrumental
"Cayenne" 1960 McCartney N/A instrumental
"Chains" 1963 [[Gerry

Goffin|Goffin]], King

Harrison Cover
"Christmas Time (Is Here Again)" 1967 Lennon, McCartney, Harrison, and Starkey Lennon, McCartney, Harrison, and Starkey 2 6 B-

side of "Free As A Bird"

"Clarabella" 1963 Pingatore McCartney Cover
"Come and Get It" 1969 McCartney McCartney Recorded by Badfinger
"Come Together" 1969 Lennon Lennon 4 1
"Cry Baby Cry" 1968 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon, with McCartney
"Cry for a Shadow" 1961 Lennon and Harrison N/A instrumental
"Crying, Waiting, Hoping" 1963 Buddy Holly Harrison Cover
"Day Tripper" 1965 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon and McCartney 1 5 Double A-side with "[[We Can Work It

Out]]"

"Dear Prudence" 1968 Lennon Lennon McCartney on drums
"Devil in Her Heart" 1963 Drapkin Harrison Cover
"Dig a Pony" 1969 Lennon Lennon
"Dig It" 1969 Lennon, McCartney, Harrison, and Starkey Lennon Not on "Let It Be...Naked"
"Dizzy Miss Lizzy" 1965 Williams Lennon Cover
"Do You Want to Know a Secret" 1963 Lennon and McCartney Harrison 2 US single only
"Doctor Robert" 1966 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon
"Don't Bother Me" 1963 Harrison Harrison
"Don't Ever Change" 1963 Goffin, King Harrison Cover
"Don't Let Me Down" 1969 Lennon Lennon 35 B-side
"Don't Pass Me By" 1968 Starkey Starkey Featuring Jack Fallon on fiddle.
"Drive My Car" 1965 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney
"Eight Days a Week" 1964 Lennon and McCartney Lennon, with McCartney and Harrison 1 US single only
"Eleanor Rigby" 1966 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney 1 11 Authorship disputed[1]
"Etcetera" 1968 McCartney McCartney
"Every Little Thing" 1964 McCartney Lennon and McCartney
"Everybody's Got Something to Hide Except Me and My Monkey" 1968 Lennon Lennon
"Everybody's Trying to Be My Baby" 1964 Harrison Cover
"Fixing a Hole" 1967 McCartney McCartney Co-authorship claim by Mal Evans
"Flying" 1967 Lennon, McCartney, Harrison, and Starkey N/A instrumental
"For No One" 1966 McCartney McCartney Inspired by Jane Asher. Featuring Alan Civil on french horn .
"For You Blue" 1969 Harrison Harrison 1
"Free as a Bird" 1995 Lennon, with McCartney,

Harrison and Starkey

Lennon, McCartney, and Harrison 2 6
"From a Window" 1964 Lennon and/or McCartney N/A Single by

Billy J. Kramer with the Dakotas, July 1964

"From Me to You" 1963 Lennon and McCartney Lennon and McCartney 1 41
"From Me to You Fantasy (instrumental)" 1963 Lennon and McCartney
"From Us to You" 1963 Lennon and McCartney Lennon and McCartney
"Get Back" 1969 McCartney McCartney 1 1
"Getting Better" 1967 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney
"Girl" 1965 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon
"Glad All Over" 1963 Bennett, Tepper, Schroeder Harrison Cover
"Glass Onion" 1968 Lennon Lennon
"Golden Slumbers" 1969 McCartney McCartney
"Good Day Sunshine" 1966 McCartney McCartney
"Good Morning Good Morning" 1967 Lennon Lennon
"Good Night" 1968 Lennon Starkey
"Got to Get You into My Life" 1966 McCartney McCartney 7
"Hallelujah, I Love Her So" 1960 Charles McCartney Cover
"Happiness Is a Warm Gun" 1968 Lennon Lennon
"Hello, Goodbye" 1967 McCartney McCartney 1 1
"Hello Little Girl" 1962 Lennon Lennon Recorded by The Fourmost, released August 1963
"Help!" 1965 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon 1 1
"Helter Skelter" 1968 McCartney McCartney B-Side (USf)
"Her Majesty" 1969 McCartney McCartney
"Here Comes the Sun" 1969 Harrison Harrison
"Here, There and Everywhere" 1966 McCartney McCartney
"Hey Bulldog" 1968 Lennon Lennon, with McCartney
"Hey Jude" 1968 McCartney McCartney 1 1
"Hippy Hippy Shake" 1963 Romero McCartney Cover
"Hold Me Tight" 1963 McCartney McCartney
"Honey Don't" 1964 Perkins Starkey Cover
"Honey Pie" 1968 McCartney McCartney
"How Do You Do It?" 1962 Murray Lennon Cover
"I Am the Walrus" 1967 Lennon Lennon 56 B-side
"I Call Your Name" 1964 Lennon Lennon EP release (UK). First release by [[Billy J.

Kramer|Billy J Kramer with the Dakotas]], July 1963

"I Don't Want to See You Again" 1964 McCartney and/or Lennon N/A Single by Peter and Gordon, September 1964
"I Don't Want to Spoil the Party" 1964 Lennon Lennon 39 B-side (US)
"I Feel Fine" 1964 Lennon Lennon 1 1
"I Forgot to Remember to Forget" 1964 Stan Kesler and Charlie Feathers Harrison Cover
"I Got a Woman" 1963 Charles Lennon Cover
"I Got to Find My Baby" 1963 Berry Lennon cover
"I Just Don't Understand" 1963 Wilkin, Westberry Lennon Cover
"I Lost My Little Girl" 1962 McCartney Lennon
"I Me Mine" 1970 Harrison Harrison
"I Need You" 1965 Harrison Harrison
"I Saw Her Standing There" 1963 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney, with Lennon 14 B-side (US)
"I Should Have Known Better" 1964 Lennon Lennon 8 53 B-side in the US to A Hard Day's Night and a B-Side to Yesterday in the UK
"I Should Have Known Better (instrumental" 1964 Lennon George Martin and His Orchestra
"I Wanna Be Your Man" 1963 McCartney, with Lennon Starkey
"I Want to Hold Your Hand" 1963 Lennon and McCartney Lennon and McCartney 1 1
"I Want to Tell You" 1966 Harrison Harrison
"I Want You (She's So Heavy)" 1969 Lennon Lennon
"I Will" 1968 McCartney McCartney
"If I Fell" 1964 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon and McCartney 53 B-side (US)
"If I Needed Someone" 1965 Harrison Harrison
"If You've Got Trouble" 1965 Lennon and

McCartney

Starkey Authorship unclear
"I'll Be Back" 1964 Lennon Lennon
"I'll Be on My Way" 1963 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney Single by Billy J Kramer with the Dakotas, April 1963
"I'll Cry Instead" 1964 Lennon Lennon 25 US single only
"I'll Follow the Sun" 1964 McCartney McCartney
"I'll Get You" 1963 Lennon and McCartney Lennon and McCartney B-side
"I'll Keep You Satisfied" 1963 Lennon and/or McCartney Lennon and/or

McCartney

Single by Billy J Kramer with the Dakotas, November 1963
"I'm a Loser" 1964 Lennon Lennon
"I'm Down" 1965 McCartney McCartney B-side
"I'm Gonna Sit Right Down and Cry (Over You)" 1963 Thomas, Biggs Lennon Cover
"I'm Happy Just to Dance with You" 1964 Lennon Harrison 95 B-side (US)
"I'm In Love" 1963 Lennon Lennon Written for The Fourmost, single released November 1963
"I'm Looking Through You" 1965 McCartney McCartney Inspired by Jane Asher
"I'm Only Sleeping" 1966 Lennon Lennon
"I'm So Tired" 1968 Lennon Lennon
"I'm Talking About You" 1962 Berry Lennon Cover
"In My Life" 1965 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon Authorship disputed[1]
"In Spite of All the Danger" 1958 McCartney and

Harrison

Lennon
"In the Tyrol (instrumental)" 1965 Ken Thorne
"It Won't Be Long" 1963 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon
"It's All Too Much" 1967 Harrison Harrison
"It's for You" 1964 Lennon and/or McCartney N/A Single by

Cilla Black, July 1964.

"It's Only Love" 1965 Lennon Lennon
"I've Got a Feeling" 1969 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney, with Lennon
"I've Just Seen a Face" 1965 McCartney McCartney
"Jazz Piano Song" 1969 McCartney, Starkey McCartney Seen only in

Let it Be, the Movie

"Johnny B. Goode" 1964 Berry Lennon Cover
"Julia" 1968 Lennon Lennon B-Side (US)
"Junk" 1968 McCartney McCartney The Beatles (White Album) outtake
"Kansas City/Hey, Hey, Hey, Hey" 1964 Leiber, Stoller/Penniman McCartney Cover
"Keep Your Hands Off My Baby" 1963 Goffin, King Lennon Cover
"Komm Gib Mir Deine Hand" 1964 Lennon/McCartney/Nicolas/Hellmer Lennon and McCartney German version of "I Want to Hold Your Hand"; the German translators were credited as co-writers
"Lady Madonna" 1968 McCartney McCartney 1 4
"Leave My Kitten Alone" 1964 Turner, McDougall Lennon Cover
"Lend Me Your Comb" 1963 Twomey, Wise,

Weisman

Lennon and McCartney Cover
"Let It Be" 1969 McCartney McCartney 2 1
"Like Dreamers Do" 1962 McCartney McCartney Recorded by The Applejacks
"Little Child" 1963 Lennon

and McCartney

Lennon and McCartney
"Lonesome Tears in My Eyes" 1963 Burnette, Burnette, Burlison, Mortimer Lennon Cover
"Long, Long, Long" 1968 Harrison Harrison
"Long Tall Sally" 1964 Blackwell, Johnson, Penniman McCartney Cover; EP release (UK)
"Looking Glass" 1962 McCartney McCartney
"Love Me Do" 1962 McCartney, with Lennon Lennon and McCartney 4 1 featuring Andy White on drums
"Love Me Tender" 1962 Fosdick, Poulton Sutcliffe[2][3] Cover
"Love of the Loved" 1962 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney Single by Cilla Black, September 1963
"Love You To" 1966 Harrison Harrison
"Lovely Rita" 1967 McCartney McCartney
"Loving You" N/A Leiber, Stoller Sutcliffe[2] Cover
"Lucille" 1963 Penniman, Collins McCartney Cover
"Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" 1967 Lennon Lennon
"Madman" 1969 Lennon Lennon From "Get Back/Let It Be" recording sessions
"Maggie Mae" 1969 (Traditional) arr. Lennon, McCartney, Harrison, Starkey Lennon Cover, not on "Let It Be...Naked"
"Magical Mystery Tour" 1967 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney
"Mailman, Bring Me No More Blues" 1969 Katz,

Roberts, Clayton

Lennon Cover
"Martha My Dear" 1968 McCartney McCartney
"Matchbox" 1964 Perkins, Jefferson Starkey (Best) 17 Cover; US single only; EP release (UK)
"Maxwell's Silver Hammer" 1969 McCartney McCartney
"Mean Mr. Mustard" 1969 Lennon Lennon
"Memphis, Tennessee" 1963 Berry Lennon Cover
"Michelle" 1965 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney
"Misery" 1963 Lennon and McCartney Lennon and McCartney
"Money (That's What I Want)" 1963 Gordy & Bradford Lennon Cover
"Moonlight Bay" 1963 Percy Wenrich,

Edward Madden

Lennon, McCartney, Harrison, Eric Morecambe, Ernie Wise Performed on the

Morecambe and Wise Show in 2/12/63

"Mother Nature's Son" 1968 McCartney McCartney
"Mr. Moonlight" 1964 Johnson Lennon Cover
"No Reply" 1964 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon, with McCartney
"Nobody I Know" 1964 McCartney with or without Lennon N/A Single by Peter and Gordon, May 1964
"Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown)" 1965 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon
"Not a Second Time" 1963 Lennon Lennon
"Not Guilty" 1968 Harrison Harrison The Beatles (White Album) outtake
"Nothin' Shakin' (But the Leaves on the Trees)" 1963 Fontaine Harrison Cover
"Nowhere Man" 1965 Lennon Lennon 3 US single only
"Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da" 1968 McCartney McCartney 49 Released as a single in the U.S. in 1976
"Octopus's Garden" 1969 Starkey, with Harrison Starkey
"Oh! Darling" 1969 McCartney McCartney
"Old Brown Shoe" 1969 Harrison Harrison B-side
"One After 909" 1969 Lennon Lennon and McCartney
"One and One Is Two" 1964 McCartney McCartney Single by the

Strangers with Mike Shannon, May 1964

"Only a Northern Song" 1967 Harrison Harrison
"Ooh! My Soul" 1963 Penniman McCartney Cover
"Paperback Writer" 1966 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney 1 1
"Penny Lane" 1967 McCartney McCartney 2 1 Double A-side with "Strawberry Fields Forever". Featuring

David Mason on Piccolo trumpet

"Piggies" 1968 Harrison Harrison
"Please Mr. Postman" 1963 Dobbins, Garrett, Holland, Bateman, Gorman Lennon Cover
"Please Please Me" 1962 Lennon Lennon and McCartney 2 3
"Polythene Pam" 1969 Lennon Lennon
"P.S. I Love You" 1962 McCartney McCartney 4 10
"Rain" 1966 Lennon Lennon 1 23 B-side
"Real Love" 1979 (1995) Lennon, with McCartney, Harrison, Starkey Lennon 4 11
"Revolution" 1968 Lennon Lennon 1 12 Hey Jude B-side
"Revolution 1" 1968 Lennon Lennon
"Revolution 9" 1968 Lennon, with Harrison and Starkey N/A
"Ringo's Theme (This Boy) (instrumental)" 1964 Lennon George Martin and His Orchestra
"Rip It Up/"Shake, Rattle, and Roll"/"Blue Suede Shoes"" 1969 Blackwell-Marascalco ("Rip It Up"), Calhoun ("Shake, Rattle, and Roll"), Perkins

("Blue Suede Shoes")

Lennon and McCartney Cover
"Rock and Roll Music" 1964 Berry Lennon Cover
"Rocky Raccoon" 1968 McCartney McCartney
"Roll Over Beethoven" 1963 Berry Harrison 68 Cover
"Run for Your Life" 1965 Lennon Lennon
"Savoy Truffle" 1968 Harrison Harrison
"Searchin'" 1962 [[Jerry Leiber and Mike

Stoller|Leiber, Stoller]]

McCartney Cover
"September in the Rain" 1962 Al Dubin, Harry Warren McCartney Cover
"Sexy Sadie" 1968 Lennon Lennon Originally called "Maharishi"
"Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band" 1967 McCartney McCartney 63 71 Co-authorship claim by Mal Evans
"Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (Reprise)" 1967 McCartney McCartney, Lennon and Harrison
"Shakin' in the Sixties" 1969 Lennon Lennon
"She Came in Through the Bathroom Window" 1969 McCartney McCartney
"She Loves You" 1963 Lennon and McCartney Lennon and McCartney 1 1
"She Said She Said" 1966 Lennon Lennon
"She's a Woman" 1964 McCartney McCartney 4 B-side
"She's Leaving Home" 1967 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney, with Lennon arranged by Mike Leander
"Shout" 1964 Isley,

Isley, Isley

Lennon, McCartney, Harrison, and Starkey Cover
"Sie Liebt Dich" 1964 Lennon and McCartney Lennon/McCartney/Nicolas/Montague 97 German version of "[[She

Loves You]]"; the German translators were credited as co-writers

"Slow Down" 1964 Williams Lennon 25 Cover; B-side (US); EP release (UK)
"So How Come (No One Loves Me)" 1963 Bryant, Bryant Harrison Cover
"Soldier of Love (Lay Down Your Arms)" 1963 Cason, Moon Lennon Cover
"Some Other Guy" 1963 Leiber, Stoller, Barrett Lennon and McCartney Cover
"Something" 1969 Harrison Harrison 4 1 Double A-side with Come Together"
"Step Inside Love/Los Paranoias" 1968 McCartney (Step Inside Love); Lennon, McCartney, Harrison, and Starkey (Los Paranoias) McCartney "Step Inside Love" was recorded by Cilla Black, 1968
"Strawberry Fields Forever" 1967 Lennon Lennon 2 8 Double A-side with "Penny Lane"
"Sun King" 1969 Lennon Lennon
"Sure to Fall (In Love with You)" 1963 Perkins, Claunch, Cantrell McCartney Cover
"Sweet Little Sixteen" 1963 Berry Lennon Cover
"Take Good Care of My Baby" 1962 Goffin,

King

Harrison Cover
"Taxman" 1966 Harrison, with Lennon Harrison
"Teddy Boy" 1969 McCartney McCartney The Beatles (White Album) outtake
"Tell Me What You See" 1965 McCartney McCartney
"Tell Me Why" 1964 Lennon Lennon
"Thank You Girl" 1963 Lennon and McCartney Lennon and McCartney 35 B-Side
"That Means a Lot" 1965 McCartney McCartney Authorship unclear; recorded by P.J. Proby
"That'll Be the Day" 1958 Allison, Holly, Petty Lennon Cover
"That's All Right (Mama)" 1963 Crudup McCartney Cover
"The Ballad of John and Yoko" 1969 Lennon Lennon 1 8
"The Bitter End/You Can't Do That (instrumental)" 1965 Ken Thorne/Lennon, with McCartney, arr. Thorne
"The Chase (instrumental)" 1965 Ken Thorne
"The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill" 1968 Lennon Lennon Featuring Yoko Ono and Maureen Starkey as background singers
"The End" 1969 McCartney McCartney
"The Fool on the Hill" 1967 McCartney McCartney
"The Honeymoon Song" 1963 Theodorakis, Sansom McCartney Cover
"The Inner Light" 1968 Harrison Harrison 96 B-side
"The Long and Winding Road" 1969 McCartney McCartney 1
"The Night Before" 1965 McCartney McCartney
"The Sheik of Araby" 1962 Smith, Wheeler-

Snyder

Harrison Cover
"The Word" 1965 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon, McCartney, and Harrison
"There's a Place" 1963 Lennon and

McCartney

Lennon and McCartney
"Things We Said Today" 1964 McCartney McCartney
"Think for Yourself" 1965 Harrison Harrison
"This Boy" 1963 Lennon Lennon, McCartney, and Harrison B-Side
"Three Cool Cats" 1962 [[Jerry Leiber and Mike

Stoller|Leiber, Stoller]]

Harrison Cover
"Ticket to Ride" 1965 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon 1 1
"Till There Was You" 1963 Willson McCartney Cover
"Tip of My Tongue" 1962 Lennon and/or McCartney McCartney/Lennon Recorded by The Beatles in November 1962, now lost; recorded by Tommy Quickly, released July 1963
"To Know Her is to Love Her" 1963 Spector Lennon Cover
"Tomorrow Never Knows" 1966 Lennon Lennon
"Too Much Monkey Business" 1963 Berry Lennon Cover
"Twist and Shout" 1963 Medley, [[Bert

Berns|Russell]]

Lennon 1 2 Cover
"Two of Us" 1969 McCartney McCartney, with Lennon Written for Linda McCartney
"Wait" 1965 Lennon and McCartney Lennon and McCartney
"Watching Rainbows" 1969 Lennon, with McCartney Lennon without Harrison
"We Can Work It Out" 1965 McCartney, with Lennon McCartney 1 1 Double A-side with "Day Tripper" Was inspired by

Jane Asher

"What Goes On" 1965 Lennon, with McCartney and Starkey Starkey 81
"What You're Doing" 1964 McCartney McCartney
"What's The New Mary Jane" 1968 Lennon Lennon The Beatles (White Album) outtake, was inspired by Syd Barret.
"When I Get Home" 1964 Lennon Lennon
"When I'm Sixty-Four" 1967 McCartney McCartney
"While My Guitar Gently Weeps" 1968 Harrison Harrison featuring Eric Clapton on electric guitar
"Why Don't We Do It in the Road?" 1968 McCartney McCartney
"Wild Honey Pie" 1968 McCartney McCartney
"Winston's Walk" 1960 Lennon N/A instrumental
"With a Little Help from My Friends" 1967 McCartney, with Lennon Starkey 63 71
"Within You Without You" 1967 Harrison Harrison
"Woman" 1965 McCartney (as Bernard Webb

or A. Smith)

McCartney Single by Peter and Gordon, January 1966, performed by The Beatles in 1969 at "Let

It Be" film sessions

"Words of Love" 1964 Holly Lennon and McCartney Cover
"Yellow Submarine" 1966 McCartney Starkey 1 2
"Yer Blues" 1968 Lennon Lennon
"Yes It Is" 1965 Lennon Lennon, McCartney, and Harrison 1 46 B-side
"Yesterday" 1965 McCartney McCartney 8 1
"You Can't Do That" 1964 Lennon Lennon 1 48 B-side
"You Know My Name (Look Up the Number)" 1969 Lennon Lennon and McCartney 2 B-side
"You Know What to Do" 1964 Harrison Harrison Full band demo recorded 3 June 1964
"You Like Me Too Much" 1965 Harrison Harrison
"You Never Give Me Your Money" 1969 McCartney McCartney
"You Really Got a Hold on Me" 1963 Robinson Lennon and Harrison Cover
"You Won't See Me" 1965 McCartney McCartney
"You'll Be Mine" 1960 Lennon and McCartney McCartney
"Young Blood" 1963 Leiber, Stoller Harrison Cover
"Your Mother Should Know" 1967 McCartney McCartney
"You're Gonna Lose That Girl" 1965 Lennon Lennon
"You've Got to Hide Your Love Away" 1965 Lennon Lennon Written as a tribute to Bob Dylan

List of the Beatles songs table

edit

All of those songs that say "(instrumental)" in the title of the songs should not be there. You have "A Hard Day's night(instrumental)". That and the others like it have to be deleted. Also, the "(ringo's theme)" past of "This Boy" shouldn't be there, and the songs from the "Help" movie. And we need to get all of those songs that i put in the discussion of the list of beatles songs page have to be added.--Snowconeboy789 06:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments like this are why I don't do much on Wikipedia anymore. Comments like "Should not be there" and "have to be deleted," without explanation, are not helpful. We don't take orders; we reason things out. It appears you believe you own the page ("all of those songs that i put in the discussion ... have to be added"), which you don't. I offered this table to compare U.S. and U.K. versions of the albums. Whatever you call it (since they're not all Beatles performances), it is a complete listing of what's on the albums. I put this table on my personal page, not the public page, so be polite please.  ~ InkQuill  03:26, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

2011 TV series episodes

edit

HAWAII FIVE-0

edit
Series
#
Season
#
Title Directed by Written by Original air date Production
code
U.S. viewers
(million)
251x"Haʻiʻole"
"Unbreakable"
Steve BoyumPeter M. Lenkov & Paul ZbyszewskiSeptember 19, 2011 (2011-09-19)20112.19[4]
While McGarrett sits in prison awaiting trial for the murder of the governor, Danny brings him a surprise visitor to help clear him. Meanwhile, Kono is suspended from the force, pending an internal investigation.
262"Ua Lawe Wale"[5]
"Taken"
Duane ClarkMelissa Glenn & Jessica RiederSeptember 26, 2011 (2011-09-26)202TBA
273"Kameʻe"[6]
"The Hero"
Jeffrey HuntElwood ReidOctober 3, 2011 (2011-10-03)203TBA
284"Mea Makamae"[7]
"Treasure"
UnknownUnknownOctober 10, 2011 (2011-10-10)TBATBA

NCIS

edit
No. in
series
No. in
season
Title Directed by Written by Original air date U.S. viewers
(millions)
1871x"Nature of the Beast"[8]Tony WharmbyGary GlasbergSeptember 20, 2011 (2011-09-20)TBD
1882"Restless"[9]James Whitmore, Jr.Steven D. BinderSeptember 27, 2011 (2011-09-27)TBD
1893"The Penelope Papers"[10]Arvin BrownNicole Mirante-MatthewsOctober 4, 2011 (2011-10-04)TBD


NCIS: LOS ANGELES

edit
No. in
series
No. in
season
Title Directed by Written by Original air date Prod. No. Viewers
(millions)
491x"Lange, H."[11]Tony WharmbyShane BrennanSeptember 20, 2011 (2011-09-20)#301TBD
502"Cyber Threat"[12]Dennis SmithR. Scott GemmillSeptember 27, 2011 (2011-09-27)#302TBD
513"Backstopped"[13]Terrence O'HaraDave Kalstein and Shane BrennanOctober 4, 2011 (2011-10-04)#303TBD


Ichthus: January 2012

edit
 

ICHTHUS

January 2012

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

WP:Anglican navbox colour discussion

edit

Hullo, fellow WikiProject-er. We're having a discussion about the colours of Anglicanism navboxes. Please do come along and weigh in. DBD 18:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, InkQuill. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Kidd's Island) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Kidd's Island, InkQuill!

Wikipedia editor AngusWOOF just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've redirected this to Thimble Islands. The specific island is not independently notable and the two sources provided did not help identify the specific island but were rather general articles about the Thimble Islands.

To reply, leave a comment on AngusWOOF's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

AngusWOOF (barksniff) 23:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, InkQuill. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ a b Regarding the "Eleanor Rigby"/"In My Life" dispute, this article gives Lennon a co-writer's credit on 'Eleanor Rigby', and McCartney a co-writer's credit on 'In My Life'.
  2. ^ a b "Stuart Sutcliffe > Biography". Allmusic. Retrieved 2007-10-06. {{cite web}}: line feed character in |title= at position 17 (help)
  3. ^ Norman, Philip. Shout!: The Beatles in Their Generation.
  4. ^ Seidman, Robert (September 20, 2011). "Monday Broadcast Final Ratings: 'Two and a Half Men,' '2 Broke Girls,' DWTS Adjusted Up; 'Castle' Adjusted Down". TV by the Numbers. Retrieved September 20, 2011.
  5. ^ "Governer Denning Assigns a New Member to the Five-0's Task Force, and the Heat is on for Kono, on "Hawaii Five-0," Monday, Sept. 26". CBS Press Express. Retrieved August 30, 2011.
  6. ^ "(#203) "Kame'e (The Hero)"". The Futon Critic. Retrieved September 14, 2011.
  7. ^ "Hawaii Five-0 : Mea Makamae". Zap2It. Retrieved September 15, 2011.
  8. ^ "(#901) "Nature of the Beast"". Listings - NCIS on CBS. the Futon Critic. Retrieved August 19, 2011.
  9. ^ "(#902) "Restless"". Listings - NCIS on CBS. TheFutonCritic. Retrieved September 14, 2011.
  10. ^ "(#903) "The Penelope Papers"". Listings - NCIS on CBS. TheFutonCritic. Retrieved September 16, 2011.
  11. ^ "(#301) "Lange, H."". Listings - NCIS: Los Angeles on CBS. the Futon Critic. Retrieved August 19, 2011.
  12. ^ "NCIS: Los Angeles Episode Info - Cyber Threat". MSN.com. Retrieved August 31, 2011.
  13. ^ "(#303) "Backstopped"". Listings - NCIS: Los Angeles on CBS. the Futon Critic. Retrieved September 16, 2011.