Human-baiting edit

  • Keep per Colonel Warden and Dream Focus. There is a point at which our personal bureaucratic/deletionist tendencies become harmful to the Foundation's vision statement. This is a good example. Ingersollian (talk) 19:31, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination on Jessi Slaughter cyberbullying case edit

I have nominated Jessi Slaughter cyberbullying case, an article which you created, to be included on DYK at the thread here. Fingers crossed it'll succeed and we'll see this on the main page. Christopher Connor (talk) 10:33, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Jessi Slaughter cyberbullying case edit

I have nominated Jessi Slaughter cyberbullying case, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessi Slaughter cyberbullying case. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Crisis Doomsday /Clock 18:07, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've left a note for you at ANI and PERM/RW. FT2 (Talk | email) 21:08, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, FT2. I've been busy, but I really appreciate it. Ingersollian (talk) 20:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer permission edit

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:11, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Edit-a-thon, party, and Legislative Data workshop March 14–15 edit

Hi, you have worked on some relevant Wikipedia content, so I wanted to be sure you are aware of the following. (I don't know where you live, so apologies if it is not possible for you to get to an event in DC!)

Please join these Wikipedia events hosted by the Cato Institute! The main purpose is to explore ways in which an XML schema under development for bills in U.S. Congress can be designed in a way that supports improving/expanding Wikipedia content.

  • Intro to Wikipedia & edit-a-thon (Thursday March 14, afternoon)
  • Reception & networking event (Thursday March 14, evening)
  • Workshop/planning session (Friday March 15, 9:30–4) application required

There's a Wikipedia page for the events here: Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Legislative Data Workshop and a blog post here: Wikipedia Legislative Data Workshop Hope to see you there! -Pete (talk) 23:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:RobertGIngersoll-audience.jpg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:50, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply