Wikipedia

Infomednet

Joined 1 April 2009
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Daniel Case in topic Speedy deletion nomination of Buy Viagra Online

May 2009 edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Generic drug do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Versageek 06:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Generic drug. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Versageek 06:59, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply


Domain-tracking

Spam domains:

Related domains:

Sharing the medpharmacy.stimulhosting.com server and not yet blacklisted:

Sharing the medpharmacy.stimulhosting.com server and previously blacklisted:

Sharing the same customer service phone numbers: (646) 205-2937 and/or (866) 417-5821:

Accounts
Earlier report

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 02:43, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply


  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 22:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Buy Viagra Online edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion
 

A tag has been placed on Buy Viagra Online, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Buy Viagra Online and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. bonadea contributions talk 17:47, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 18:25, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Infomednet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not know what I blame? What do I advertise? I do not have any external links! I know the rules of creating pages. If you are due to Viagra, I would link to an internal page of Wiki - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viagra. In the early pages, I wrote that I was not pursuing commercial interests. I have just described the expression that's all.

Decline reason:

We don't have much tolerance for linkspamming--especially the volume of linkspamming you engaged in. Blueboy96 04:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Infomednet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK. I have no rights. I apologize for the inconvenience. Please unlock my UserName and delete from list of spam sites - storenaturalcare.com. I undertake not spam and do not bring any inconvenience. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Insufficiently responsive to request. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your contribution history indicates that your only interest in Wikipedia was linkspamming. Can you give us an idea of what kinds of edits you would be making as a Wikipedia editor? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Infomednet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unfortunately, about the changes I can not say anything. I no longer intend to linkspamming, my interest in Wikipedia has no more will be linked to linkspamming. Excuse me for this inconvenience. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Only one unblock request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

After three unblock requests, all of which were unclear on top of their broken English, I have decided to protect this page so admins can focus their time on other editors who may have valid reasons for unblock. Daniel Case (talk) 16:50, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Infomednet&oldid=1140510841"