I fail to see how this frankly rather amareurish design does anything. I could create an image of Hubal myself, one that is far more likely to resemble the original that than this ridiculous horned and cloaked super-villain figure that looks as though it comes from a teenager's fantasy derived from reading modern comic books. There is nothing encyclopedic about this image that I can make out. Paul B (talk) 15:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have raised the issue at Wikipedia talk:Image use policy. Paul B (talk) 16:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2015 edit

  This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Wikipedia_talk:Image_use_policy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I understand that some of the comments about your artwork were hurtful, but you can't respond in the way you have been. EEng (talk) 16:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Apologies edit

I admit I went a too far in describing the picture, and for that I do apologize. I do not even expect an apology in return for the continual failure to assume good faith, the unevidenced accusations of bias, or trying to teach "good manners" by claiming that I was raped by a priest and insinuating that I'm suicidal.

I hope you have a better experience on the site, and advise that things go better when you:

Ian.thomson (talk) 18:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply