Welcome

edit
Hello, Indian Kolkatan, and Welcome to Wikipedia!    

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Indian Kolkatan, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Indian Kolkatan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Indian Kolkatan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Dagoberto Borges— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:19, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of mayors of Enna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Nogent-l'Abbesse, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Johnuniq (talk) 05:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mr. Monkey for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr. Monkey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Monkey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Titodutta (talk) 17:24, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
It seems like you have two purposes here: 1) to make hundreds of pointless edits to your sandbox and 2) to engage in petty vandalism, such as this edit. Neither is useful, so you've been indefinitely blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indian Kolkatan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am new to Wikipedia and don't know the policies but I am accepting my mistake. Now I had learned from my mistake and promise that I will never repeat it in future. Please forgive me and unblock me. Thanking you with due respect.

Decline reason:

No. You've made hundreds of garbage edits; one or two might be a mistake, but this was high speed vandalism, and we don't need it here. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 05:13, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Indian Kolkata Talk

What is is that you want to edit about if unblocked? 331dot (talk) 19:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • Non-Admin Comment - citing my one interaction with the editor in question, I oppose unblocking the editor. I first put Indian Kolkata on my watchlist after I saw them vandalize Baluan; serendipitous for my example, their edit [1] came less than 4 minutes after I had created [2] the article, and so I immediately knew it was vandalism. Maybe on a sunny day this could be construed as a test edit (directed at changing content in an infobox, which a newer editor may be cautious about changing), but Indian Kolkata's contributions show that they had already edited other infoboxes and thus can reasonably be understood to know what they were doing, blatant vandalism in this case.--SamHolt6 (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
@SamHolt6:I think this is not vandalism but these are mistakes which I will never repeat in future as I am a new editor I don't know about all these and blocking system but now I knew it very well and I am dying to edit Wikipedia. Please unblock me. What I had done is a past but now I am thinking about the future. Thanking you with due respect. Indian Kolkata Talk

I knew it that I had done wrong but please please I am begging please unblock me. I promise that I never do vandalism and if this time I do then you block me but please please give me last chance I am dying to edit Wikipedia. I have lots of hope but please don't break my hope. Please........ Give me last chance. Thanking you with due respect Indian Kolkata Talk 12:37, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indian Kolkatan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I knew it that I had done wrong but please please I am begging please unblock me. I promise that I never do vandalism and if this time I do then you block me but please please give me last chance I am dying to edit Wikipedia. I have lots of hope but please don't break my hope. Please........ Give me last chance. Thanking you with due respect

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Read our guide to improving articles
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
    1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
    2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
      • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
      • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
      • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
      • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
    3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
    4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
    5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
  • Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yunshui  08:13, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"Birpurush" (Bengali: বীরপুরুষ, IPA: [biːrpuruʃ], English:The Hero) is a Bengali poem written by Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore[1] . The poem depicts a child fantasising that he saves his mother from dacoits.[2][3]

About The Poem

edit

In this poem[4][5], poet Tagore said that in the evening, when the sun is set, the child and his mother reach a barren place. There is not a single soul there. Even the cattle have returned home. Plodding silence reigns there. The mother is a bit afraid and wonders where they have arrived. The child reassures her and tells her that there is a small river ahead.[a] The mother sees a shimmering light and asks her son about it. Suddenly, they hear the cry "Ha re, re re, re re"[b] as a band of dacoits attacks their caravan. The mother shivers inside the palanquin; the palanquin-bearers hide in the bush. The son reassures his mother and confronts the dacoits courageously. A fight follows, in which the son emerges victorious. The son returns to his mother, who kisses his forehead and thanks him.

The imagination now turns from this event as the poet wonders why some exciting thing like this does not actually happen in the mundane course of everyday life. The poet contemplates that it would be like an adventure story that would fascinate everybody.

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Bengali: মরা নদীর সোঁতা
  2. ^ Bengali: হাঁরে রে রে রে রে।

References

edit

References

  1. ^ "Birpurush summary". 2019-06-14.
  2. ^ Manjula Datta (18 April 2001). Bilinguality and Literacy: Principles and Practice. Continuum International Publishing Group. pp. 4–. ISBN 978-0-8264-4840-8. Retrieved 22 August 2012.
  3. ^ "Tagore Poem | Birpurush - The Brave man". WBRi. Retrieved 22 August 2012.
  4. ^ "Birpurush poem". 2019-06-14.
  5. ^ "Tagore poem". 2019-06-14.
edit

June 2019

edit

  One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Yunshui  11:37, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indian Kolkatan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I had done editing above as Yunshui has told me, now I am begging that please please unblock me. I am talking oath in the name of God that I will never do vandalism in Wikipedia. Now I am dying for editing. Please give me a last chance and accept my request, now I am a blocked user but in future I may be the best user so please give me a chance. Thanking you with due respect.

Decline reason:

This doesn't really address anything or tell us how you'll behave differently if you're unblocked. I'm declining the request and revoking talk page access so people don't have their time wasted on-wiki in the future. If you wish to appeal, you may do so through WP:UTRS. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:51, 20 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Tej Yadav

edit
 

Hello, Indian Kolkatan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tej Yadav".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 06:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply