Chasnor15 edit

I saw your comments to User:Chasnor15 on his talk page (though it took me a little while to straighten out what you had written due to subsequent edits that munged your signature). He made three wording changes at Stonyhurst Saint Mary's Hall:

  • persecution to prohibition--this is a question of fact, not of usage. I am not familiar with the facts, but I suggest that the two of you resolve the issue by reference to reliable sources.
  • before to that--this was a grammatical correction: Chasnor15 was right, and the article was wrong before he fixed it.
  • sport to sports--either is correct; this is a regional variation. Wikipedia standards are not to make changes between equally correct usages or spellings due to regional variation, in order to avoid interminable flip-flopping. Chasnor15 may not have been aware of this standard, but the edit does not suggest a lack of English fluency.

I believe you owe Chasnor15 an apology. Matchups 01:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

He made several edits which had to be undone, not just to that page but to numerous others. Mine was not the only complaint on his talk page. I was frustrated after working so hard on the page that someone should come along and spoil it with redirects to the wrong places and lots of brackets around terms which were specifically being described in that article, and so redirected to nowhere. I politely suggested that he not assume an English sentence were wrong *if* English were not his *first* language, an inference left open by the *total* of his contributions. I do not see why I owe him an apology. Imaginativename (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have just read your article and would like to suggest a change, if I may be so bold. The word "Saint" in the name for SMH has begun to creep into use in recent years when the diminutive "St" is the tradition. I tried to change this in the article (my apologies), but was unsuccessful. Busgarlo (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with File:SaddleworthYorkssign.JPG edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:SaddleworthYorkssign.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.news.dalesman.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/saddleworth1.JPG. As a copyright violation, File:SaddleworthYorkssign.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:SaddleworthYorkssign.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mr Stephen (talk) 22:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deletion refused on basis it's not exactly the same photo - same camera, same settings, but 4 seconds different in the EXIF data.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:SaddleworthYorkssign.JPG missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:SaddleworthYorkssign.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Stonyhurst College crest.JPG edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Stonyhurst College crest.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply