Illadelph halflife

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Quadruple-double‎ . Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Chris! _ct 03:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

What a joke. Would you like me to send this to you?--Illadelph halflife (talk) 03:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

You are a sock. And you think you are in position to warn others. Now that is a joke. Chris! _ct 04:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I am not a "sock". And you think that you are in position to blindly accuse and regardless, you are still going against Wikipedia policies.--Illadelph halflife (talk) 04:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:Chrishomingtang, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. BoL (Talk) 03:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

You have violated the three-revert rule. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring. BoL (Talk) 04:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Blow of Light, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. BoL (Talk) 04:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert ruleat quadruple-double. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Illadelph halflife (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You have the wrong user. User:Chrishomingtang is the user who engaged in an edit war. He continually attempted to revert Quadruple-double to include questionable content. By Wikipedia's policies, questionable content should not be added until consensus is met. There is currently no consensus.

Decline reason:

On the one hand, it takes two to edit war. On the other hand, multiple editors were reverting your changes. When two different editors reverted your first two attempts to make a change, that was a sign that you should have gone (back) to the talk page to sort it out. —C.Fred (talk) 04:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Illadelph halflife (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I DID go to the talk page. Like I said, it is something currently in debate. Questionable material does not belong in a Wikipedia article without consensus. This editor, User:Chrishomingtang seems to make a habit of reverting constructive edits made by myself. See NBA records for another example of his antics. I added a verifiable fact and he proceeded to remove it without even looking at it.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sockpuppet of TyrusThomas4lyf. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 05:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.