Your submission at Articles for creation: Brief Biography of Monday Sunday Adiaha (August 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 22:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ifeomanwaka! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 22:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Brief Biography of Monday Sunday Adiaha

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Brief Biography of Monday Sunday Adiaha, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 22:25, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Young Scientist in Nigeria (September 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not about showing recognition and lists are for linking to notable topics with articles already. This also is a dated and insufficiently defined list. What classifies as Young and would require too much curating as they begin to age out.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 22:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

List of Nigerian scientists and scholars

edit

  Hello. Your recent edit to List of Nigerian scientists and scholars appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

List of African educators, scientists and scholars

edit

  Hello. Your recent edit to List of African educators, scientists and scholars appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:48, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monday S. Adiaha (September 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 20:07, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monday Sunday Adiaha (September 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 01:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tagging pages for deletion

edit

Hello, Ifeomanwaka,

Please do not tag any pages for deletion. You do not have the experience editing on Wikipedia to know what the speedy deletion criteria are and when they apply. If you want to experiment, please use the Sandbox or your own User pages. If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia or the deletion processes, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

If User:Adiahachristy is also an alternate account you use, please note this fact on your main User page or you could be engaging in sockpuppetry which can lead to problems here. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:28, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monday Sunday Adiaha (September 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 00:46, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monday Sunday Adiaha (October 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Fails WP:ACADEMIC and WP:GNG no chance of acceptance at his point
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 21:31, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monday Sunday Adiaha (October 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Any further submissions without vast improvement will be met with possible deletion
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 22:10, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monday Sunday Adiaha (October 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gorden 2211 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gorden 2211 (talk) 22:01, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monday Sunday Adiaha (October 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Curbon7 (talk) 02:38, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monday Sunday Adiaha (October 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Tol was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please do not submit this draft again.
Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Monday Sunday Adiaha

edit

If you submit this draft again, it will be deleted and salted, meaning it cannot be created again without the express permission of an administrator. S0091 (talk) 21:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ifeomanwaka. In case others have not precisely explained why the article gets deleted (and I cannot look at the deleted pages as a non-administrator), it's important for the article to cite sources independent of the subject that demonstrate notability (WP:BLPRS, WP:CITE, WP:BLPN). Even when an article is in a seminal, incomplete state, it's always a good idea to list the sources so that patrollers can see them. If those are lacking, it is difficult to write a neutral article or to provide even basic material about the person. Sources that help to assess notability are also generally expected to be more than short mentions or entries in directories, press releases, etc. —PaleoNeonate – 19:05, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ifeomanwaka. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 16:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:List of Young Scientist in Nigeria

edit

  Hello, Ifeomanwaka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Young Scientist in Nigeria, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:List of Young Scientist in Nigeria

edit
 

Hello, Ifeomanwaka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Young Scientist in Nigeria".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply