User talk:Idea8623/sandbox/Exari Systems

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Davidwr in topic Copied from Talk:Exari

Copied from Talk:Exari

edit

Most references are useless to establish notability

edit

I checked out the references as they existed at 21:13, 1 October 2013.

Here's what I found:

  • ijlit - seems okay, paywalled, only used to site basic info and that the company "was participant in the LegalXML eContracts ... standardization process"
  • iaccm, isda, lloyds, law.standford - no mention or trivial mention
  • patentscope - primary, non-independent, BUT suitable for verifying patent claim
  • vermontlaw - a paragraph about how this company is collaborating with the university, primary, not competely independent
  • xerlin - primary, non-independent
  • kmworld - Decent writeup of InsuranceAccelerator, part of an interview with an Exari client that uses this product. Note: This is an industry-specific web site.
  • informationweek - similar but broader. BUT is appears to be a slight rewrite of the press release http://www.exari.com/News/Media-Releases/HDI-Gerling-Insurance-Licenses-Exari.html from the day before.
  • araggroup - based on press release at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/04/prweb5229014.htm from the day before.
  • reuters - a press release

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

The sources in question

edit

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Reply