Iconicos

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sulphur Aeon (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sulphur Aeon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sulphur Aeon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:15, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Iconicos! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:15, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Excuse me, what do you mean with "interviews and press releases are not suitable sources for establishing notability"? There is a Metal Hammer source which says that the recent album was awarded "album of the month" by the magazine. There are reviews in the special press. I don't get your point. --Iconicos (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Added much more sources now, the article passes WP:NMUSIC, so please rethink your verdict.--Iconicos (talk) 19:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Scythe of Cosmic Chaos

Hello Iconicos,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Scythe of Cosmic Chaos for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:32, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

What a nonsense. Instead of reviewing Draft:Sulphur Aeon to get the main article for this clearly notable band, the album article is speedy deleted. And I don't even get the chance to contest it, because I'm offline. Big bull****.--Iconicos (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

The main reason it would have been deleted is because the band article has not been successfully reviewed (and was declined on the first review). It is natural to be upset when articles are declined but you must remember that the articles need reliable, independent citations to make sure the subject is notable prior to be included on the main space. Rather than complaining your time would be better spent taking this advice on board and working to ensure the band article is properly referenced. If you need any help then ping me. Regards Hughesdarren (talk) 09:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Dear Hughesdarren, please view the history of the draft closely. Since the first review, I added 19 (!!!) good sources, which are NO interviews or press releases. So I can not imagine any reason why it isn't included immediately. I apologize for my words, but I would be very grateful when the draft gets included soon.--Iconicos (talk) 16:36, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Taking a look at Draft:Sulphur Aeon now, and have started filling out reference templates, see my message below about Van Records, if you could do this yourself it would help the reviewers out alot. Given the number of references in the article this might take a while. I'm also working on a couple of other articles and involved in a couple of lengthy deletion discussions so you will have to be patient, might take a few days. Regards Hughesdarren (talk) 07:57, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Now the artist has an article the album would stand a much better chance of getting through. Regards Hughesdarren (talk) 10:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I will probably do so soon.--Iconicos (talk) 20:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Ván Records) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ván Records.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work, you've put alot of effort into this article. - I have tidied up the references. Please take note as how I've laid the references out with the url, title, accessdate and publisher fields all completed. This will save reviewers a bunch of time when going through the various references. Many of us will only check the first few if you do not do this yourself. In passing this article through I would say that this article barely passes notability the many magazines referenced are independent but the reliability of some of them would be questionable.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 07:47, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your work. I'm not that much into the details of referencing, but maybe I can learn from this. Regarding notability: Legacy and Rock Hard are longstanding, well-established print magazines which you can find at nearly every kiosk or shop in Germany. The Ván Records label is one of the most important, if not THE most important Black Metal/Occult Rock label in Germany and beyond, so it has a leading role for this genre. It has even created an own festival. How many labels organize festivals? I consider this notable.--Iconicos (talk) 19:23, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

I just added a book source and a source from Der Spiegel to underline notability.--Iconicos (talk) 19:41, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Yes Rock Hard is one of the notable publications - if you are interested the full list is at WP:RSMUSIC. Notability (on Wiipedia) isn't about opinion it is about finding multiple independent reliable sources. Books and Der Spiegel are definitely big ticks - well done. Anyway no-one has contested my curation of Van Records so it looks like it should be through. Cheers Hughesdarren (talk) 23:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sulphur Aeon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sulphur Aeon. Thanks! Otr500 (talk) 07:25, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

I have made a few more changes in keeping with the reviewers wishes. Hopefully it should be more to there liking next time they review it. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 08:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sulphur Aeon has been accepted

Sulphur Aeon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Otr500 (talk) 05:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gregor Mackintosh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)