talk

edit

May 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pakistan and state terrorism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Xionbox 13:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Senseless thing?

edit

Please stop pushing your pro indian pov onto this site your vedic trash will not be tolerated on wikipedia 86.178.27.67 (talk) 13:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

What on earth are you blabbering about? Ichigo0987765 (talk) 14:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Guidance

edit

In reply to User_talk:Xionbox#Guidance

Dear Ichigo,

In fact, editor Maheshkumaryadav seems to have a strong POV on the specific issue of Osama bin Laden. It also seems that you are not the first to mention it, cf. his/her user talk page.

I'll be honest and say I cannot do much about that particular user. The only difference on Wikipedia between the both of us, is that I have been here longer. That's really about it. I encourage you monitor the edits of this user on articles which may be subjected to POV modifications. Anyhow, Wikipedia is fairly monitored by editors like the both of us. In other words, if POV edits aren't catch by one of us, they most probably will be caught by other users.

As for your edits, they seem to be correct (for the most part). If you would like to know more about Wikipedia and how you can help, feel free to copy and paste the following on the top of this page (which is the user talk page): {{helpme}}.

Xionbox 13:55, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thankyou Ichigo0987765 (talk) 14:05, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Dear Ichigo,
I have posted a message on the user talk page of user Maheshkumaryadav which will hopefully bring to light some unnecessary and/or non neutral edits.
Don't hesitate to keep me posted on further problems.
Xionbox 07:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
In reply to User_talk:Xionbox#Thanks_2
You're very welcome. I'm glad I could help.
See you around!
Xionbox 11:44, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

dear Ichigo0987765

edit

Please contest the article for deletion, before doing so. The census should be taken into consideration before deleting or merging. I am working for Wikipedia and not against it in any way. The article name can be changed, content can be changed, instead of complete deleting it as you seem to be doing. Most of the articles were well referenced. Completely denying the well referenced content and deleting the articles is not 'democratic' and 'civic' I hope you would help neutralize the articles with your POV instead of completely deleting or redirecting. Thanks.(Mahesh Kumar Yadav (talk) 16:49, 5 May 2011 (UTC)).Reply

Your attention is required

edit

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Reactions to the death of Osama bin Laden. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - 2/0 (cont.) 06:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

  Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. This language is not acceptable. Please refrain. Drmies (talk) 18:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Edits

edit

Excellent catch with the move. I had missed that, so I wanted to thank you. :-)

Homo Logica (talk) 14:27, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply