IPFrehley

Block

IPF, I'm blocking this account for the same reason I blocked your previous one, WordBomb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). You attempted to "out" a user by posting what you believe is his real name. When I asked for an assurance that it wouldn't happen again, you posted it once more. Now you've created this new account and posted an image alleging that the same person is a sockpuppet of another user.

Please understand that attack accounts are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and nor is harassment. If you have legitimate sockpuppet concerns, there are ways of bringing them to the community's attention. Please e-mail me using the link on my user page if you would like to sort this out. I'll be happy to lift the block if I can be assured that the harassment will stop. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 14:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Please check your email for my reply. Or if you would prefer, I'll post it here. --Wikipalooza2006 20:13, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I haven't received an email from you. If you do post anything here, be sure not to post your beliefs about people's real-life IDs. If you do, the information will be deleted from the history, so you'll have gained nothing, and you and all your future sockpuppets will be blocked on sight. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I should add that I'm sorry to speak so harshly. It's just that posting perceived real names is something there is no tolerance of on WP. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I understand. I'll post my email to you below verbatim, substituting variables for proper names.

Please e-mail me

Hi again, as you're making allegations about another editor, so far without substance that I can see, I think we should do this by e-mail, so I'm going to remove the claims and protect this page from editing in the meantime. My email address is slimvirgin at gmail dot com. Please send me details of why you think a violation of WP:SOCK has taken place (please review the policy page so you understand what constitutes a violation), and then I can make a judgment as to whether there are grounds for taking it any further. Many thanks, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 02:38, 19 July 2006 (UTC)