ILoveMashiroShiina

Welcome!

Hello, ILoveMashiroShiina, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Draft:Massacre of migrants in Austria. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Maestro Spinelloccio (talk) 14:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Massacre of migrants in Austria (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Massacre of migrants in Austria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Happysailor ^(Talk) 18:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello! ILoveMashiroShiina, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Happysailor (Talk) 18:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Massacre of migrants in Austria concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Massacre of migrants in Austria, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Massacre of migrants in Austria

Hello, ILoveMashiroShiina. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Massacre of migrants in Austria".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your number changes

You've been changing numbers (mainly or all population numbers) while leaving the sources. Either you are changing the numbers so that they accurately reflect the sources, or you are changing the numbers and they no longer match the sources. Which is it please? And please respond as if you continue to change numbers and it turns out they don't match the sources I'm not sure there's any alternative except to block you from editing, as clearly population numbers must match the sources. See WP:VERIFY. I'm sure you don't want to be blocked. Doug Weller talk 12:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Doug Weller the user keeps on edit-warring even after your warning ([1][2]). These reverts don't even have edit-summaries. Something needs to be done here. Étienne Dolet (talk) 00:31, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop arbitrarily changing population figures given in the sources. This is disruptive editing and needs to stop. Athenean (talk) 18:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 10:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Misleading edit summaries and mass deletion of sourced material

Using the edit summary "misspell fixed" you deleted:

"Armenian boys who were orphaned due to the Armenian Genocide were conscripted into the Turkish army by Kazim Karabekir to fight against Armenia during the Turkish-Armenian War of 1920]] When the modern Republic of Turkey was founded in 1923, nationalism and secularism were two of the founding principles. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the leader of the early years of the Republic, aimed to create a nation state (Turkish: Ulus) from the Turkish remnants of the Ottoman Empire. Kemalist ideology defines the "Turkish People" as "those who protect and promote the moral, spiritual, cultural and humanistic values of the Turkish Nation." One of the goals of the establishment of the new Turkish state was to ensure “the domination of Turkish ethnic identity in every aspect of social life from the language that people speak in the streets to the language to be taught at schools, from the education to the industrial life, from the trade to the cadres of state officials, from the civil law to the settlement of citizens to particular regions.”"

References

You've done the same at a number of other articles, eg at December 2015–February 2016 Cizre curfew you deleted a large amount of text where I could easily see clearly reliable sources such as university press books, major media outlets, etc. You've also copied from sources which is a copyright violation. Although I won't block you myself I will ask for you to be blocked or topic banned from articles relating to Turkey or Kurdish issues if this continues. Doug Weller talk 18:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello ILoveMashiroShiina, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Başbağlar massacre has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 18:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dersim massacre has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dersim massacre was changed by ILoveMashiroShiina (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943527 on 2016-07-09T19:33:42+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

There is a discussion of your edits at ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 20:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for disruptive editing. Despite warnings, you have continued to remove large chunks of text with egregiously misleading edit summaries, as here, and have also removed reliably sourced text with arguments like "who decides university press books are reliable sources?". There is consensus that they are. You can't decide sources are unreliable because you don't agree with what they say. Also, after the serious warning about copyright violation above, you reinserted text copied from here yet again.[3] When you return from this block, please discuss controversial edits on article talkpages instead of edit warring to push in your preferred version. I see you have never posted on a talkpage, not even this one (your own). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 21:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

PKK casualties

Just wanted to note something regarding information from your source. 7,000 is the overall figure for both killed and captured PKK, not just killed. Turkey regularly uses the term neutralized, which has been missinterpreted by some as meaning killed. While in fact it refers to both dead and arrested. The source you cited [4] in fact does a full breakdown of those neutralized into three categories (dead, arrested, surrendered). This was further confirmed by the third-party Crisis Group [5] which, per the Turkish military, cited 4,949 PKK deaths for the same date (same figure and date as in the source you provided us). Hope this all clears it up and you keep updating the articles. :) Also, your opinion would be appreciated on a discussion at the 1978-present article in regards to the latest overall figures (as of August 2015) provided by a Turkish security source via Anadolu Agency, which was quoted by several other media outlets. An editor has been removing the figure and reverting to older outdated figures (older by 4-9 years). He claimed the source yenisafak (which you yourself used) is controversial (without saying how), claimed the source was not cited (even though it was), and claimed nobody else reported on the figures (even though it was reported on by at least three other media outlets). Cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 19:44, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

None of the sources you provided claim a figure of 44,000 PKK dead. Please provide proper source if indeed there is a claim of 44,000 dead. EkoGraf (talk) 16:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at December 2015–February 2016 Cizre curfew.
After you have been repeatedly reported and blocked for previous disruptive editing, your recent edits constitute a clear instance of vandalism. You've been massively removing properly sourced information (Mirror, Guardian, Reuters, Deutsche Welle, Cumhuriyet etc.), replacing it with unsourced content, sometimes stating the opposite of the prior, to deliberately push a particular POV, in this case the position of the AKP government. You're not even trying to be balanced or objective, and are hiding your unsourced replacement content behind the misleading edit summary "New informations added." I don't think you're WP:HERE to build an encyclopedia, but let's see how others weigh in..

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:ILoveMashiroShiina.The discussion is about the topic December 2015–February 2016 Cizre curfew. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 15:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive and tendentious editing after several warnings and previous blocks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 17:15, 12 September 2016 (UTC)