Hurlzzz

Feedback reply

Posted here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_April_13#User:Hurlzzz.2FQuartet_Books. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:59, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of PhotoGuide Japan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on PhotoGuide Japan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 00:28, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Appropriate reference to content from a Public Blog?

When I Published my draft article on William McPherson Rice, I received a warning related to its inclusion of a link to a site known for hosting public blogs.
The note said that if I considered that the reference was not self-promotion or inappropriate, I could continue to publish the article.

The "Further Reading" section of the article contains 2 references:

1. A link to a PDF scan in the Internet Archive of Rice's 1822 letter to the Admiralty reporting his analysis of the ancient vessel discovered on the river Rother (published in 1824)
2. A transcription into HTML of the article above enriched with Maps and photographs of the actual places and terrain described in Rice's letter. The Blogger has an interest in History and, apart from the illustrations, their captions and attributions and hyperlinks to Wikipedia articles, has not altered the content or provided personal comment. The fact that the content is in HTML means that it can be searched and referenced, which the PDF scan cannot support.

For these reasons I consider it not inappropriate to include it.
This is the mark-up of the offending section:

Further reading

• Rice, William McPherson (1822). "Archaeologia – Volume XX – 1824: Account of an ancient Vessel found under the old bed of the river Rother in Kent". Retrieved 8 July 2021.
• Rice, William McPherson (7 September 2020). "Malaga Bay Web Blog Transcription (with additional illustrations) of Rice's Account of an ancient Vessel found under the old bed of the river Rother in Kent". Retrieved 8 July 2021.

Is there a better way of referencing a site that transcribes the work of an original author to HTML but does not claim authorship of it?

Your submission at Articles for creation: William McPherson Rice has been accepted

William McPherson Rice, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1930s portrait of Josef Hartinger.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1930s portrait of Josef Hartinger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caroline Hussey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Noonan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Irish Haemophilia Society

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Irish Haemophilia Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://haemophilia.ie/ and https://haemophilia.ie/services-and-support/introduction-to-the-i-h-s/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 22:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Hurlzzz

Thank you for creating Irish Haemophilia Society.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

February 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at BTSB anti-D scandal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 15:57, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

What are you about? I wrote practically every word of this article and have added copious references over many months. Last week I corrected some typos and awkward syntax of my own text. Not ever sentence added or modified in an article requires a reference. With which specific change do you have an issue? Hurlzzz (talk) 11:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)