Your submission at Articles for creation: SynthBase (January 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eyebeller was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eyebeller 19:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Hunges! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eyebeller 19:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:SynthBase

edit

  Hello, Hunges. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SynthBase, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:SynthBase

edit
 

Hello, Hunges. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SynthBase".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Netherlands Judo Association (September 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 19:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dutch Judo Federation (September 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dutch Judo Federation (September 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 10:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I don't understand why the Dutch Judo Federation doesn't meet the notability requirements.
There are many national Judo Federations on en.wikipedia.org, for example: German Judo Federation, Italian Federation of Judo, Norwegian Judo Federation. The federation also has a page on nl.wikipedia.org: Judo Bond Nederland. I don't see why the Dutch Judo Federation is less notable than the others.
The Dutch Judo Federation may not get as much media attention as their athletes (from foreign outlets), but this does not change their - international - significance. The Netherlands is a big player in the judo world with many world/Olympic champions (Anton Geesink, Henk Grol, Angelique Seriese, etc etc). The judo federation facilitated their training, and more. Also take a look at the members of the Dutch Olympic committee.
My draft may not contain all there is to say. But it is at least a starting point, so that other Wikipedia users can contribute (and grow) to the article.
Can you explain witch things I am missing in this draft?
(@Jamiebuba, @DoubleGrazing) Hunges (talk) 10:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sure, happy to explain.
Notability standards for organisations are defined in WP:ORG. We need to see significant coverage of the subject, in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and entirely independent of the subject and of each other. This draft cites only primary sources, which cannot be used to establish notability.
Whether there exist articles on similar organisations from other countries doesn't come into it. Neither does the existence of an article on this subject in other language version(s) of Wikipedia, as each language version is entirely independent with their own policies and requirements.
HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your response. The need for independent secondary sources is perfectly logical. I thought that the 2nd version of the draft had enough 'secondary sources'. I just added some more, and submitted it. Hunges (talk) 13:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply