Your submission at Articles for creation: Dolarkheda has been accepted

edit
 
Dolarkheda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:13, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hartala has been accepted

edit
 
Hartala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Poppified talk 11:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ruikheda

edit

This is a new article about a village in Maharashtra, Ruikheda. Huge Earth (talk) 07:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Village articles

edit

For your village articles, I took the liberty of dividing content in Geography into Geography and Demographics. Also nilgai, not Neel Gay. David notMD (talk) 09:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank for correcting me.You can contribute. Huge Earth (talk) 10:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Maison Fournaise

edit

Your image width 10000 had to be reverted. David notMD (talk) 20:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm J. M.. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Stefanos Tsitsipas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 17:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Huge Earth. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 10:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Changdeva Temple has been accepted

edit
 
Changdeva Temple, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

URL refs

edit

In the articles you created, some of the refs are URLs. The refs may be valid, but a better format is preferred. See Help:Referencing for beginners. David notMD (talk) 12:49, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

More refs issues

edit

Jalgaon district has a lot of refs problems. Fix before a reviewer agrees to review the GA nom. David notMD (talk) 15:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tell me how to fix it ??? Huge Earth (talk) 17:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

You had assigned the same ref name "cenus 2011" to two different refs. I fixed it. David notMD (talk) 20:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for doing some work on refs issue Huge Earth (talk) 06:11, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Research Voltas per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kundan Ravindra Dhayade. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 13:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Dowry Prohibition Act 1961

edit
 

The article The Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article was created by a persistent sock who is now banned. This should be removed per WP:BMB

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 22:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply