Huba huba huba hot chick
January 2010 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Sandahl (♀) 17:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Giants27, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shubinator (talk) 17:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Why you issued this vandalism warning? What vandalism I did? --Huba huba huba hot chick (talk) 18:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- I'm referring to this edit. Shubinator (talk) 18:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Where is vandalism in it? --Huba huba huba hot chick (talk) 18:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- It's a taunting message to a regular editor. Why did you add the sentence to his talk page? Shubinator (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- I HATE people calling themselves giant or god or devil when they are ordinary human being. Does asking this simple question constitute vandalism? --Huba huba huba hot chick (talk) 18:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- I assume his username is a reference to the New York Giants. Your explanation is hard to believe since you would have phrased the question as "a giant" instead of "giant" if you were referring to magical creatures, and because of your username. Shubinator (talk) 18:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- I HATE people calling themselves giant or god or devil when they are ordinary human being. Does asking this simple question constitute vandalism? --Huba huba huba hot chick (talk) 18:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- It's a taunting message to a regular editor. Why did you add the sentence to his talk page? Shubinator (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Where is vandalism in it? --Huba huba huba hot chick (talk) 18:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- I'm referring to this edit. Shubinator (talk) 18:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello; please don't keep adding messages to User talk:Wikiadencart when it's clear they're not desired. Thank you. Evil saltine (talk) 18:13, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, encouraging people is good, but users are allowed for the most part to control their own talk page (see Wikipedia:TPG#User_talk_pages). Evil saltine (talk) 18:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:ConcernedVancouverite. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. tetraedycal, tetraedycal 18:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- That was not vandalism because I was uncertain of his ability to work as a vandal fighter and was surprised to see he is member of counter vandalism unit. This is why I issued him that message. --Huba huba huba hot chick (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
An administrator has blocked your account as an troll-only account, and because your edits are troll-prone, I have reverted all of your edits. Minimac94 (talk) 18:22, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Explain why my edits look like troll prone to you? --Huba huba huba hot chick (talk) 18:23, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Huba huba huba hot chick (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am a good editor.
Decline reason:
Not a reason for unblock, and the warnings above suggest otherwise. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:25, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- If you want to expand the encyclopedia, why are you only editing on user talk pages? Shubinator (talk) 18:32, 31 January 2010 (UTC)