July 2021 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stan Swamy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 04:23, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Stan swamy's edit was true to his character as leftist editors made him look like a great figure when according to he was a criminal accused of instigating riot.wikipidea should refrain from havin politically motivated article writer by writing against government . It can cause legal action against you like Twitter Hritidipan sarmah (talk) 03:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 04:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Parwaaz Hai Junoon, you may be blocked from editing. Idell (talk) 05:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

September 2021 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rudaali have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:08, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to List of terrorist incidents in Pakistan since 2001. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Eevee01(talk) 06:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Krishnatrey edit

Hello, Hritidipan sarmah

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Krishnatrey for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tame (talk) 18:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2022 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 20:10, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply