AfC notification: Draft:Hustler Bhai has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hustler Bhai. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 04:56, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Hustler Bhai has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hustler Bhai. Thanks! • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hustler Bhai (September 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 18:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Hpluspluslk! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 18:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Editing with a possible conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Hpluspluslk. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--SamHolt6 (talk) 18:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hustler Bhai (September 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 06:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hustler Bhai (September 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Hustler Bhai edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hustler Bhai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 18:32, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Block notice edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:38, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • As it has become clear that your sole purpose in editing Wikipedia is to promote yourself, I have blocked you from editing. Your attempt to circumvent the Articles for Creation process when your draft was repeatedly declined is unacceptable; please find another platform for promotion.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:38, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hpluspluslk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i am new to wikipedia, If any mistake happen, that won't happen again. Thank you. Do not block.

Decline reason:

Since you don't seem to know what it is that you did wrong, there are no grounds to lift the block. You will need to explain what it is you did wrong, why it won't happen again, and what productive contributions you will make instead. Please read WP:GAB to learn how to craft an acceptable unblock request. I am declining this one. 331dot (talk) 06:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hpluspluslk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have mistakenly added the same article that i have posted for submission on the user page. i am new to wikipedia and this won't happen again. Hpluspluslk (talk) 18:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No, this does not accurately describe the problem with your edits. Yamla (talk) 18:46, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hpluspluslk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

what is the blocked reason? can i know. Hpluspluslk (talk) 03:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. The reason for the block is explained above, with links to the relevant policies. If you continue to make time-wasting unblock requests like this, your access to this talkpage will also be removed. Yunshui  07:18, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hpluspluslk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have mistakenly added my article on the user page, then they have deleted the page & blocked me. It won't happen again. Please unblock me. Thank you.

Decline reason:

I agree with the withdrawal of your ability to make further appeals. MER-C 18:13, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As this is substantially similar to a previous request, I am removing your talk page access as promised. I will leave this request open, and another admin may restore your access if they see fit, but if your request is declined you will need to use WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 15:40, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

If English is not your primary language, you may feel more comfortable editing the version of Wikipedia in your primary language. 331dot (talk) 15:42, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hustler Bhai (October 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Huon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Huon (talk) 16:37, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Hpluspluslk (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #27022 was submitted on Oct 06, 2019 17:26:13. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 17:26, 6 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Hustler Bhai edit

  Hello, Hpluspluslk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hustler Bhai, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:04, 6 April 2021 (UTC)Reply