Hoorah83

Speedy deletion nomination of Acellus

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Acellus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard (talk) 10:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Hello, Hoorah83. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but  Acellus has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising#Typical signs of blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Dlohcierekim/promo. These are just rough guides. Pages can avoid all those pitfalls and still be glaringly obvious ad copy. Sometimes pages meeting WP:CSD#G11 give the appearance of an editor violating Wikipedia:Conflict of interest or WP:PAID. Please read and heed them if they apply to you. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.

You may find this tool useful: Google custom search Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too.

There is more information at Wikipedia:Community portal. There is help available at THE TEAHOUSE. Cheers, and happy editing. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:21, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Concerning my revisions.

I just wanted to apologize for my revisions and referring to your edit initially as vandalism. I thought it was an attempt to revert to my original work and I got too caught in making the page exactly how it was before I got on it. If there's edits made on there, I will respect that. My edits have been mostly biased and based on awful sources. I do believe some of my edits were also good (I wanna say I readded some goldkey stuff but I may be mistaken) but overall they were mostly flawed and based on a conflict of interest. I just wanted to let you know that I plan on logging out of my account for good and am no longer editing the page. I apologize for editing your new revision. I had gotten a notification and I had thought it was initially just some newbie wanting to vandalize the page. We have a lot of cases of people vandalizing that page in the past and I fear I was one of them. While wanting to avoid my conflict of interest any further I think I accidentally pushed it just ever so slightly further. I want you to know that I won't be making any more edits on the page, and most likely will be leaving Wikipedia as a whole. Thanks for your patience and please forgive me for my revisions and posts.- @Fishmr Fishmr (talk) 04:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

My revisions

Hello, it's @Fishmr. I wanted to apologize for revising your post and referring to it as vandalism. I realize I was wrong and I had fear of being a conflict of interest still. I thought you were reverting it back to something I previously had it at and didn't realize you were actually properly cleaning up the page. I want you to know that I plan on never touching the page and likely never touching Wikipedia again. I plan to log out of my account for good.

I just saw your revisions through my notifications and was wanting to cover up my butt by getting rid of your changes. I hadn't realized you were actually cleaning up the page, as you've been doing for a while.

I promise to not edit this page again. Whether it be because it's vandalized or otherwise, I've decided it's not in my hands. Thank you and have a great night. Fishmr (talk) 04:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)