The Dumbarton Rail Bridge in San Francisco Bay, July 2021. Canon EOS 650D. 1/125, ISO 100, f/6.3



Email

edit

Several days ago I send you an email. Could you answer me (via email)? MBH (talk) 10:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sent. jp×g🗯️ 10:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have written a draft and posted it on submissions page, I will be glad if you read and rate it. MBH (talk) 11:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dark theme on my user page

edit

How do I get a dark theme on my user page? All I need to do is get image Solid black.svg and expand it. and change it to white text (including the display title). Here's a test page, the history is funny. I'm not asking you to code anything, btw, but point me to the templates etc. please. Much appreciated. Svampesky (talk) 20:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think @Chaotic Enby: is the resident expert on having your userpage not look like shit, I more or less gave up on trying to do anything cool with mine. From my experience you can get a lot more utility out of using a templatestyles than inline styling (would be happy to change content model for you if you want a .css page somewhere in ur userspace) jp×g🗯️ 23:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
User:Svampesky/testcode.css I tried that already. I just want my user page background to be black and the text to be white. I'll probably be able to work it out, but if its something that'll take less than five minutes for you, that would be great. Confused as to why there isn't a dark theme though. Svampesky (talk) 23:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi (and thanks for the ping JPxG)! After testing a little bit on my user page, it looks like you can't use CSS styling directly on the body of the user page, so the best trick would be to enclose the whole user page in a <div> element that would take 100% of the user page (no margins/paddings). Then you could style that independently, giving it its own id with <div id="idName"> and then doing something like #idName { background-color: black; color: white } in the CSS page. Hope that works, good luck! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 10:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Fuck you!!!

edit

you need to work on your form for bench press btw JPyG (talk) 07:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

so do you moron jp×g🗯️ 07:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
im a figment of your imagination i dont even have muscles JPyG (talk) 07:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
oh i guess thats true jp×g🗯️ 07:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
i have a good sig now jpg🗯️ 09:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
vereh smexeh if i do say so mahself ^_^ jp×g🗯️ 09:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
zomg me iz teh smexehest!!!111oneoneone jpg🗯️ 09:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
The sex man hath arrived. The sex man gives you a low rating. 85.99.16.60 (talk) 16:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Messed up if true. jp×g🗯️ 04:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

FYI

edit

Hi JP, respectfully, I wish to point out that you're, at this point, more than kinda, wheel-warring with perms on your main account. I wouldn't want you to take my word for it, but I would caution against proceeding in the same vein without confirming. Regards, — Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Usedtobecool: This is troubleshooting phab:T367025. jp×g🗯️ 19:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Usedtobecool: My last removal was for redundant groups I saw no point in keeping. The main point was that it could be bad for statistics. As JPxG said above, the recent perm changes were for testing a MediaWiki bug. Although account creator is still a redundant group, it is fine since he removed it afterwards. I erroneously removed EFM in the removal when EFM is not a redundant group, and I have self reverted. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 02:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Great to hear all's well between the admins, but the logs do give an impression of a wheel war with more than one admin having removed some of JP's perms as redundant, and JP having restored them again without discussion. Reinstatement of account creator right in particular clearly breached WHEEL restrictions, especially since the original action was also clearly stated to be for testing purposes and was reversed anyway. All WHEEL asks is that you discuss it somewhere; I think that's reasonable. I also think 0xDeadbeef's summaries could be better. In both instances, 0xD references discussions but does not link them. If those discussions happened offline, I think that's important to note too. All that said, I should not be editing Wikipedia at all right now, so I leave you two to it. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 17:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yeah true. My summaries were not too good. These discussions did happen offline. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 03:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-24

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

edit
  Greetings, JPxG. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

A T-shirt for you

edit
 
I CREATED {{stupid t-shirt}} AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS STUPID T-SHIRT

Queen of Hearts (🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈) 01:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wow! He is LITERALLY me!!!!!!!!! jp×g🗯️ 01:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
You’re funny breh Zanahary 23:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-25

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

One for the archives

edit

Talk:Rupert_Sheldrake#Talkpage_"This_article_has_been_mentioned_by_a_media_organization:"_BRD

Why can't people see that these are just funny!? As well as politely note the existence of non-WP views. Oh well, annoying non-WP-article publishers do have a handicap in this context. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I suppose it may actually literally warrant setting up a redirect at {{Press mention WHICH DOES NOT IN ANY WAY INTEND TO ENDORSE CONDONE OR CONDEMN THE WEBSITE}}. jp×g🗯️ 18:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Switching back to an earlier topic, "old news". Just found this [18], date per article "8 hours ago". But it was very familiar, and sure, I cited it in Enhanced Games in January. Same url and everything. Weird. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Comic?

edit

I wasn't sure how to submit this to the Signpost, so I'm bugging you on your talk page instead. I made a comic for the Signpost (File:Signpost comic Cremastra.png), but I'm not sure if it's actually funny or not. Your call. Cheers, Cremastra (talk) 16:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply