Welcome

edit

Hello, Hongkim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Figma have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:59, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

February 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Figma, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:53, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Figma has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Your edit summary claimed you just added some new information, but you reverted the clean up of the article and just restored your version which uses unreilable sources and contains excessive and unnecessary detail that is unsourced. If you wish to add RELIABLY sourced content, then please do so to the current version of the article, not by putting back a bad version first. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Figma

edit

An article that you have been involved in editing, Figma, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Figma. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 06:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply