Your submission at Articles for creation: Regar Raghuvanshi Kshatriya (October 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Maliner (talk) 16:28, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Honeysingh1234321! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 16:28, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regar Raghuvanshi Kshatriya (October 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Drmies (talk) 16:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Note: all you did was add some websites, in a random list without footnotes, and not even good websites. Drmies (talk) 16:46, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

The information was taken about the article from the added websites in the reference. The information in this article is about a caste in India. Honeysingh1234321 (talk) 16:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean. The websites are not reliable sources, and there was no indication (via footnotes) which parts of the article they were intended to verify. That's probably one reason why this draft keeps getting rejected. Drmies (talk) 22:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regar Raghuvanshi Kshatriya (October 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 17:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regar Raghuvanshi Kshatriya (October 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Qcne (talk) 18:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rehgars / Regar (October 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 07:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Honeysingh1234321 (talk) 08:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

My article is different from the article name which is there on wikipedia. Rehgar and regar both are different

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rehgars / Regar (October 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rehgars / Regar (October 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

331dot (talk) 12:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please be aware edit

Introduction to contentious topics edit

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

- Sitush (talk) 15:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you recently removed content from Regar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 18:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Really sorry.. It happened by mystake I didn't know it will get published
Again really sorry Honeysingh1234321 (talk) 19:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Regar Raghuvanshi Kshatriya edit

  Hello, Honeysingh1234321. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Regar Raghuvanshi Kshatriya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Rehgars / Regar edit

  Hello, Honeysingh1234321. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rehgars / Regar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply