HoneyMalt
Welcome! edit
|
November 2019 edit
Hello HoneyMalt. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Goldie Chan, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:HoneyMalt. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=HoneyMalt|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. creffett (talk) 00:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 18:23, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Unblock request edit
HoneyMalt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello! In light of some of the discussion around my recent contributions and creation of Goldie Chan, I am writing to clarify that I am not affiliated with the subject and am neither receiving nor expecting to receive compensation. After reading the guidelines on spam, advertising-only accounts, and the guide to appealing blocks, I have a better understanding of why my edits and actions gave the impression that I created an account for promotional use. I wanted to use this as an opportunity to provide some clarity and assure you that I am not here for advertising or promotional reasons. I recently created an account on a bit of a whim to learn how to contribute to Wikipedia because it is a resource that I love and want to be a part of. I noticed that Goldie Chan, someone whose work I have been following for quite some time now from afar, had achieved a lot and received a decent amount of press coverage but did not have a Wikipedia page. I was excited! This could be my first article! After poring over Wikipedia guides for days, I began drafting the page. While I was learning how to create a page, I had read that in order to create a page, users have to have accounts that are over 4 days old with at least 10 edits. Obviously, I "jumped the gun" and was too eager to create the page because I spent my free time thirstily looking for articles that I could contribute to in order to meet this minimum requirement. I manually searched for articles on subjects I knew about (i.e. K-Swiss) as well as used the random article link to see if there were improvements or updates I could provide. I was embarrassingly excited to think I could contribute something, so I wanted to do it well and spent too much time focused on meeting the requirements for creating a page and not enough time on thinking about contributing to Wikipedia in an impactful way. In hindsight, I realize that was not the best approach and could come off as very promotional and spam-like. I would love the opportunity to continue contributing to Wikipedia and learning from its community. I have an interest in different subjects that I would like to contribute to, such as apparel brands, entrepreneurship, and marketing. Moving forward, if given the opportunity, I do want to continue helping with edits and eventually creating pages, but I will take the time to learn first and build up to that. I want to continue to learn from all of those who volunteer their time for this amazing encyclopedia and hope to be able to bring value to Wikipedia. Signed, HoneyMalt a.k.a. a formerly overeager contributor HoneyMalt (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 22:22, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Personally, I don't buy your explanation. Your edits were not the actions of a new account. Do you have another account? Have you previously edited Wikipedia? What edits would you intend to make if you were unblocked? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:06, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Martin, thanks for taking the time to respond to this. I am a long time lurker and do not have another account and haven't previously made edits to Wikipedia prior to this account. I although I guess I should be kind of flattered, I am kind of at a loss for words on how else to explain/prove to you that this is really my first time dipping my toes into Wikipedia. I spent a long time researching and looking over the Wiki guidelines on how to construct a page thoughtfully and took inspiration from viewing the sources for existing pages of similar people - I spent more than 6 consecutive hours in creating that article and days of research beforehand, so (correct me if I'm wrong) I'm guessing that's why it doesn't "present as a new account." I tried to be as meticulous as possible and it backfired. When I was blocked, it was a shock to me. I wrote such a lengthy appeal because I looked into the appeal guidelines for that too and just want to do it in the best way I possibly can. As I mentioned above, if given the chance, I would love to contribute edits in the realm of modern entrepreneurship, apparel brands, and marketing in general. If unblocked, I have no desire to put myself in a situation to be blocked again. Please let me know if you have any other questions. I truly am here to try to make a difference in my edits and have definitely learned a lot from this situation. Thank you again for your time. HoneyMalt (talk) 03:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, wasn't sure if I am supposed to ping you above, so I am editing to add this: @MSGJ:. I hope that's okay. Thank you! HoneyMalt (talk) 03:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi @Yamla:, I saw the procedural decline. Do you mind helping to direct me on how to get another admin to review my request and consider my appeal? I would really appreciate it. Thank you! HoneyMalt (talk) 18:39, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Goldie Chan edit
Hello, HoneyMalt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Goldie Chan".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)