Recreation of Ewan James Melville

edit

I noticed you recreated Ewan James Melville. This was after its initial deletion as non-notable. Please read WP:N and WP:FIRST thoroughly before creating any page. Recreating a deleted page is also dangerous territory; you may want to read WP:RPDA as well. Intelligentsium (talk) 23:07, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Singing out to repeatedly remove the AfD tag from the Ewan James Melville will only wind up in your sockpuppet being blocked from editing. You are aware that certain admins have Checkuser privilege, which lets them determine whether an anonymous User is editing from the same IP address as you are, right? Consider this a final warning about vandalism. Any more disruption, and you and your sockpuppet will be listed as vandals. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ewan James Nathaniel Melville

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Ewan James Nathaniel Melville, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DanielRigal (talk) 00:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

May 2009

edit

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Ewan James Nathaniel Melville, you will be blocked from editing. DanielRigal (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Mentifisto 00:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply