Hmath729

May 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Statue of Sabrina, you may be blocked from editing. sorry, but you can't just restore unverified material to an encyclopedia; Wikia, no doubt, will gladly have it. Drmies (talk) 13:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

• OK, don't restore that again, please. The content would be unencyclopedic even if you could verify it with, I don't know, a campus publication: it's trivial. It also violated a number of other guidelines, and that includes that ridiculously long box quote. And while I have you, you removed that picture you had inserted--I assume that means that this edit was just BS? Drmies (talk) 13:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
  • @Drmies not BS, but am working with others to get it verified so people like you stop raising a fuss. check the image metadata. it's quite real. Hmath729 (talk) 13:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Again, there is no "we" here, and the only "work" acceptable here is the citing of secondary sources. If you don't understand why "check the image metadata" is not a valid argument but in fact suggests WP:NOTHERE, I suggest you read our guidelines, maybe starting with WP:5P. Drmies (talk) 13:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
    • 8@Drmies "our" guidelines, nice. so much for no "we." will return with secondary sources and the picture in the coming weeks. sorry that you couldn't be here for the return of Sabrina! Hmath729 (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
      • My "our" and your "we" are not the same thing. Drmies (talk) 13:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)