Hillrise

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hillrise (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

There must be some mistake here. This is a valid account and not a sock. It is edited constructively. Currently I share a DYK nomination with Drmies concerning a Dutch resistance worker and had hoped to continue those articles. What can be the problem here? My edits on revenge porn disruptive? Hillrise (talk) 04:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I've checked the CU results - they are pretty indisputable. Yunshui ^雲_水 08:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser-based blocks are generally unappealable by standard admins. The only persons who have the ability to fairly assess the block are other CheckUsers. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 01:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Needless to say we're not about to dismantle a network shared by some four hundred editors (Dutchies planning to take over Wikipedia - yeah right) to satisfy the concerns of Wikipedia checkusers. I shall edit on my IP (hint: it's NY). Hillrise (talk) 18:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Hanneke Ippisch

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)