Welcome to my talk page! Any question? Don't hesitate to ask me. JUST CLICK HERE

Soliciting comment... edit

Hi! Would you care to review or comment/vote (support/oppose) at my FA nomination for the article New York Dolls (album)? Information on reviewing an FA nomination's criteria is available at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 14:42, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply


Hijigne, you are invited to the Teahouse edit

Teahouse logo

Hi Hijigne! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the Warner Bros. Records edit edit

I removed that info because it was incorrect. I provided a source in the edit summary, which clearly states WaterTower Music is distributed through InGrooves Fontana. --24.211.242.224 (talk) 19:40, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

The rest of my edits you reverted can also be explained. --24.211.242.224 (talk) 18:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Make an account for yourself, thanks. HiJiGN€ Tell me 20:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 23 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Administrative divisions of Wisconsin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Board (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

Hi there. Thanks for letting me know about this ridiculous investigation. I'd just like to mention the points that the person who opened it has more or less admitted being a sockpuppet himself, that it relates to edits made over a year ago and that with that fact in mind its timing, the day after I was unblocked on a completely unrelated matter, is interesting to say the least. Anyway I'm perfectly happy to cooperate in any investigation that actually happens because I have nothing to hide. I'm an occasionally naughty editor, I admit, but I think my contentious, quarrelsome, argumentative track record can proudly speak for itself in making clear that I'm not the type to hide behind an item of woolly footwear.--FergusM1970Let's play Freckles 19:13, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar edit

Molte grazie! A presto. Cavarrone 15:56, 25 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

User:DoRD Why am i blocked?