User talk:HighInBC/Archive 39

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Question regarding your block of Cremepuff222..

Would you object horribly if I made it indef, or until such time he comes in, and explains what the bloody blue blazes he was trying to prove? SirFozzie (talk) 20:05, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

I would not mind in the slightest. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 20:45, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

lol

I've responded on my talkpage. GoodDay (talk) 00:49, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Mail

Hi, there was an issue that I wanted to ask you about and as there was a small privacy issue I have sent you an email about it. Off2riorob (talk) 20:29, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

I can give this the attention it needs after work, about 5 hours from now. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 20:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

No problem, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 20:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Any thoughts? Off2riorob (talk) 00:53, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Could you e-mail me the specific diffs? Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 00:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

It is continuing now... [1] Off2riorob (talk) 01:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

I am not really sure what can be done about this. Short of bringing the private claims you sent me into the public, which I think only you can do, I can not really demonstrate any wrongdoing. I don't see how I can even warn this user to stop without revealing private information. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 01:06, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Mm...I see what you mean, well for now I will wait and how it goes, ta. Off2riorob (talk) 01:15, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

afd

you were involved in a afd about this article before, so you might wanna read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars sequel trilogy (2nd nomination) thanks Starwarsdeathstar (talk) 21:54, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

I will look into this. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 22:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Please note Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dalejenkins#Evidence_submitted_by_A_Nobody. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 22:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Fascinating. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 00:24, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Take care

I never understood what 1 2 would mean, but I don't think that matters now. Take care of yourself. :) Ottava Rima (talk) 05:39, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

NSGP championship AfD closure

Hi Chillum - in light of this, just to say: (1) are you also planning to speedy 2009 NSGP Season, which was nominated as part of the same AfD; and (2) do you know the answer to a question the creator of both articles asked me on my talk page? Essentially I think he accepts our notability guideline but wants to know how to reproduce effects as good as the Wikipedia formatting elsewhere. Your help would be much appreciated. Gonzonoir (talk) 15:48, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

In answer to question 1, thanks I missed that and have deleted it now. In response to the second question, the user is more than welcome to use our preview feature to render a screenshot. Also there are a few services that allow you to create your own wiki for free that has the same underlying mediawiki software that Wikipedia uses such as editthis. If this user needs the content of the pages just have him ask me or any admin to e-mail the content. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 15:59, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much Chillum - I will let the user know. Gonzonoir (talk) 16:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Why was my Keep vote not counted? --85.139.161.97 (talk) 16:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

I just responded to you on the AfD talk page where you asked the same question. In short, it is not a vote, you did not base your reasoning on policy, you have made few or no edits outside of this debate, and the only significant contributor to the article consented to deletion which makes the AfD moot. I did take your opinion into consideration, but it did not really make a difference. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 16:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Comparisons between Roman and Han Empires AFD

I have responded to your request for the sources that directly make this comparison on the AFD. Please also note that the article was completely revamped to include only scholarly sources.Teeninvestor (talk) 16:29, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know, and thank you for finding sources. I will look into it and reconsider my position. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 16:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps see the current state of the article ( it was essentially replaced) ? Whatever problems may be in it, I don't see anything related to original research or synthesis? Teeninvestor (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Can you help point out any potential OR issues in the article? Thanks.Teeninvestor (talk) 00:38, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome me then

I'm the ip guy from the NSGP thing :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBestPilarYouWillEverSee (talk • contribs) 16:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Consider yourself welcomed. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 17:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! --TheBestPilarYouWillEverSee (talk) 23:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Ping

You have mail. UA 19:22, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Agreed

FYI, I agree with, and support your decision to reply publicly to an inflammatory private email. I stated this, however Ottava reverted it, to make it appear like everybody was against your decision. [2] Dave (talk) 19:41, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

I saw that, thank you for your support. It is not the first time OR has selectively removed comments from his talk page resulting in the false impression that only people who agree with him have posted. I have really said all I can to OR, if he chooses to start outing Wikipedians there is really nothing that can be done about it as he is already banned. I am sure such actions will be taken into consideration should he ever attempt to come back though.

I would far prefer that nobody got outed and that OR could return to edit productively at some point, but that is really beyond my control. All I can do is implore him not to do such things. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 19:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

I dont know if youve seen these, but

There seems to be a person making account names such as User:Chillem-slow and User:Chillim-lamebrain who has a grudge against you. If you haven't seen this before, I'm just letting you know. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 01:24, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

How very uncreative. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 05:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

How very ungrammatical. How very Chillum. 65.1.189.188 (talk) 04:31, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

And another one, at User:Chillim. Seems you've developed one really loyal fan! Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 10:15, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Some teenager gets it into his head to pull this trick 2 or 3 times a year. It seems that uncreative minds often come up with the exact same trick as each other. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 10:16, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Warning

I feel I should not have gotten a warning. It was a legitimate edit that was supposed to fixed rather than carelessly reverted. 98.234.28.27 (talk) 16:13, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

That was not a warning. It was a note about testing/experimenting somewhere other than the template itself, such as in a sandbox. However, since you have yet again inserted jibberish letters into the template(the third time now) I have left you a warning. If you do not know how to fix the template, please do not attempt to do so my inserting random letters into it. Instead attempt to explain to other what is wrong with the template. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 16:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps I am just mistaken and those were not random letters. Templates can sometimes look like gibberish, if I was mistaken about this I am sorry. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 20:26, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Pacific Surfliner template

Hello, HighInBC. You have new messages at Template talk:Pacific Surfliner.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I don't see any message directed at me on that page. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 20:41, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

A new start

You and I have not always, or even usually, seen eye to eye this year, and perhaps we never will. Nevertheless I bear you no ill will, despite all appearances to the contrary. I've always believed that disagreement is fundamentally necessary for a healthy society, and so in that spirit I'd like to wish you a Happy New Year. --Malleus Fatuorum 18:49, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

I am glad things are not as they appear. Happy New Year, and please know that disagreeing with someone on a website in no way creates hard feelings in me. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 19:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Just A Thank You

Hello Chillum just wanted to drop you a note to say “Thank You” for pulling the prod tag on the Douglass Distributing article. I came across the piece at an AFD for William "Bill" Douglass. In investigating Mr. Douglass I felt that either his company or the individual had generated enough coverage in the media to warrant inclusion here at Wikipedia. Looking at the information I felt that the company was more notable than the individual. Hence, the Douglass Distributing piece. Once again, thanks for your understanding and if you ever need a hand on anything, just let me know. Happy Holidays. ShoesssS ^Talk 18:34, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

		The Special Barnstar
		Understanding when an article is in its infancy ShoesssS Talk 18:49, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, encouragement is very important on Wikipedia. I agree the company is likely notable and I am glad someone other than the new user with a conflict of interest has taken up the task of making an article. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 20:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.