HifiGamer

You appear to be having trouble with citations

Hello, I've noticed that on a number of articles this morning you have deleted the {{reflist}} tag. Please do not do this. That tag automatically generates the references section from the references that have been placed throughout the article. The correct place to add a reference is in the body of the article next to the text that you are referencing. If you need any help please don't hesitate to ask. - X201 (talk) 12:43, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Fallout: New Vegas. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Rehevkor ✉ 11:54, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Medal of Honor (2010 video game). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Fin©™ 11:40, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to GoldenEye 007 (2010 video game). It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DKqwerty (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Medal of Honor (2010 video game), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. DKqwerty (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

External link/reference issues

Hello, I have noticed that you have on a number of occasions added a link as a citation to Fallout: New Vegas; doing so is inappropriate for a number of reasons.

First, the link itself is of limited notability: not all links, even those relating to the subject, are appropriate and the one you are adding (http://www.latestchoice.com/ArticleControl.do?parameter=getNewsArticleDetails&articleId=800210544) would not be considered notable in its own right. Second, is that citations need to relate to something; if you want to add links, please add them to the external links section of a page (or create it if it does not exist). Think of a citation as proof of a statement rather than simply a link to a "useful" page. Links to websites can simply be typed or, alternatively, put inside square brackets along with a title and separated by a space (i.e. [url title]). It should be noted however that that link would not satisfy the external link criteria for inclusion on its own. Finally, having multiple reflists is a no-no.

Please read our policy on external links here, as it may prove useful.

Thanks, Alphathon™ (talk) 12:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

January 2011

You have been blocked indefinitelyfrom editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 13:12, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HifiGamer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Didn't saw the messages of warning and the articles I submitted contains original contents

Decline reason:

You were warned twice on November 2nd not to addd spam links ([1], [2]), yet you continued to do so the next day and later. You got an other warning at 16:10 UTC on November 22nd) (a warning which explicitly says you could be blocked), so you waited a week and added an other one. This seems to suggest that were we to unblock you, you woul d continue. Additionally, looking down your edit list seems to suggest that all your edits are link spam, so we loose nothing by keeping you blocked. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:07, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.