Hallo, if you want to contact me please use my talk page on German WP.--Hic et nunc (talk) 09:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your free Cochrane account is on its way!

edit

Please fill out this very short form to receive your free access to Cochrane Collaboration's library of medical reviews: Link to form.

If you have any questions, just ask me. Cheers, Ocaasi 13:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

edit
Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

 

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 19:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Library Survey

edit

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Fertiprotekt

edit

Hello Hic et nunc,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fertiprotekt for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. J Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 10:10, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Hegassen scroll.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 15:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the good news.--Hic et nunc (talk) 06:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Senology

edit
 

The article Senology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced dictionary article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 08:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Emil Knauer

edit

Hello, Hic et nunc,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Emil Knauer! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add clear references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 22:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Boleyn: Thank you very much for your message.
I have tried to improve the article, but I am aware that there are still some problems. There are significant differences between the German and English Wikipedia on biographical articles. It would be nice if you could also smooth linguistic things out if necessary.
Regarding notability, I have no doubt that Knauer meets the notability guideline for biographies and so I can't understand the tag in the article. --Hic et nunc (talk) 13:58, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Hic et nunc. I'll look it over and see if I can help any further; the differences between English and German Wikipedia are unfortunate at times and can cause confusion, but this article is coming along nicely, thanks for your hard work. As for notability, Mydreamsparrow tagged it - Mydreamsparrow, can you let us know what your concerns are so we can look at how to address them? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 19:47, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply