January 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm A-NEUN. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Facial Action Coding System have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. A-NEUN ⦾TALK⦾ 16:30, 11 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at Dolly (sheep), may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. --Cactus.man 17:50, 11 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Human cannibalism, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Human cannibalism was changed by Heyitsgalaxycreeper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858793 on 2020-01-12T00:21:19+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Democratic Republic of the Congo. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:45, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 04:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heyitsgalaxycreeper (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I've gotten better now. Not sure if this is the place to post, but yeah, I've matured up now. Heyitsgalaxycreeper (talk) 16:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Read our guide to improving articles.
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
    1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
    2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
      • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
      • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
      • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
      • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
    3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
    4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
    5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
  • Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 16:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heyitsgalaxycreeper (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have posted the article on my talk page, albeit incorrectly (I'm not sure) but it should still count as an edit. Again, I've matured. Heyitsgalaxycreeper (talk) 17:27, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No you haven't. You are still free to follow the instructions, but must demonstrate sufficient competence here. Go back, read the instructions you've been given, and follow them. Yamla (talk) 17:30, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heyitsgalaxycreeper (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i have difficulty doing some of the instructions on mobile, so this is the best I could do. Heyitsgalaxycreeper (talk) 17:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You can use the desktop version on your phone in a browser- but that is not the issue. You clearly lack the skills or ability to follow our instructions. I would advise not requesting unblock for some time(months if not years). 331dot (talk) 19:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that your inability to follow the instructions means we should leave you blocked, I'm afraid. And it's more than just mobile. You aren't coming close to following the instructions. I'll leave your unblock request to another admin to review, but I strongly oppose unblocking you. --Yamla (talk) 17:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

fair enough, I've caused some damage that was fixed easily. Heyitsgalaxycreeper (talk) 17:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

oh, and I've editing Roro (disambiguation) Heyitsgalaxycreeper (talk) 17:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Article improvement edit

There are various myths of processions of the dead, most related to the Wild Hunt.

In Galicia and Asturias, it is known as Santa Compaña. The Benandanti in the Friuli participated to such processions.

In Hawaii, there are the Nightmarchers, spirits of dead hawaiien soldiers. Heyitsgalaxycreeper (talk) 19:35, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Article improvment 2# edit

Kikuo (written: 喜久夫, 喜久雄, 喜久男 or 規矩雄) is a masculine Japanese given name. Notable people with the name include:

  • Kikuo Arai (新井 規矩雄, born 1943), Japanese golfer
  • Kikuo Chishima (千島 喜久男, 1899–1978), Japanese scientist
  • Kikuo Takano (高野 喜久雄, 1927–2006), Japanese poet and mathematician
  • Kikuo Wada (和田 喜久夫, born 1951), Japanese sport wrestler
* Kikuo (きくお), one of the most popular Vocaloid producers known for pairing happy music with usually dark lyrics.
     (note, I'm on mobile, which means that I can't access the edit summary. Sorry about that.)

Heyitsgalaxycreeper (talk) 17:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

article improvment #3 edit

== KEMU (disambugation) KEMU may refer to:

I sincerely hope this isn't another attempt at getting unblocked. If it is, you are likely to lose access to this talk page. 331dot advised you that you clearly lack the skills or ability to follow instructions, and you continue to demonstrate this. 331dot also advised you wait months or years before requesting an unblock (this is so you can have the chance to mature significantly), but haven't done so yet. --Yamla (talk) 20:29, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

yeah, sorry

article improvment #3 take 2 edit

article improvment #3 edit

KEMU (disambugation) edit

KEMU may refer to:

article improvment #3 edit

KEMU may refer to:

Talk page access revoked edit

As you are simply being disruptive here, and as 331dot suggested you wait several months or several years before requesting an unblock, I have protected this page. This will prevent you from requesting an unblock for the next six months. You are free to contest this via UTRS, but I strongly suggest you have clearly demonstrated you are not yet ready for unblocking. --Yamla (talk) 20:56, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.