July 2007

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Regnum Umbra Ignis. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Spellcast 17:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with Regnum Umbra Ignis. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Oli Filth 17:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from an article, as you did with Regnum Umbra Ignis, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Oli Filth 18:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please note that Regnum Umbra Ignis has now been deleted. Please do not attempt to recreate the article unless is is in a much more improved form. In the meantime you are welcome to contribute to Wikipedia. You may wish to learn how to create an article in the proper manner, with appropriate references, to help you in your editing. Have fun. LessHeard vanU 19:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Regnum Umbra Ignis, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. This article has already been deleted once. Oli Filth 20:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Regnum Umbra Ignis

edit

A tag has been placed on Regnum Umbra Ignis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Oli Filth 20:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by removing speedy deletion templates and recreating deleted pages after warnings. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. - Philippe | Talk 22:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply