HermitCrab84

September 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Hello, I'm ST47. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Party and play— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ST47 (talk) 02:25, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Im being trolled

What are you taoking about? Im being haradsed by a troll on here... you have certain users that seemed to think they have the right to place links on a page and then prevent any other person from editing medpage whatsoever by means of complaining you guys constantly and you guys seem to always miss that they're doing that don't you get it but the people who are usually complaining to you the first and loudest are usually the one at fault? Vet the person who started the conversation talking about how he keeps getting screwed over and scammed is usually the scammer? HermitCrab84 (talk) 02:30, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  –Darkwind (talk) 04:52, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HermitCrab84 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wasn't standing, I wasn't even placing links I was correctly editing and inaccurate phrase within the context of the Paige and labeling it appropriately I was however being spammed and apparently you look into LinkedIn account history over logic reason or even looking into what was said and done because it no point that I spam or even so much as a link let alone , what I was changing was the inaccurate alleged slang of "pilly willy" which does not exist to the correct widely used"tweaker dick". Since I had been wrongfully banned I requested that it be made and that the offending party who misused the admin complaint system to begin with be banned

Decline reason:

I regret to inform you that your unblock request is declined as (a) it is largely incomprehensible, and, (b) it does not address the matter of your seemingly arbitrary insertion of links to pornographic video websites (e.g. [1]). Your request "that the offending party who misused the admin complaint system to begin with be banned" is also declined due to absence of proper venue. Chetsford (talk) 07:21, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.